Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #26 2011-08-07 02:11:41
Re: Sequences!Yes, it can't have a general term! "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #27 2011-08-14 07:52:35
Re: Sequences!hi gAr The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #28 2011-08-26 04:51:02
Re: Sequences!hi guys The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #29 2011-08-26 19:01:03
Re: Sequences!Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #30 2011-08-26 23:09:47
Re: Sequences!how can you be so sure? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #31 2011-08-27 03:07:09
Re: Sequences!If you read generatingfunctionology then you should be a little bit conversant with the concept. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #32 2011-08-27 03:08:57
Re: Sequences!i find finding taylor and maclaurin series very amusing. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #33 2011-08-27 03:21:20
Re: Sequences!Amusing or confusing? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #34 2011-08-27 03:44:12
Re: Sequences!amusing as u can see! The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #35 2011-08-27 03:48:55
Re: Sequences!Hi anonimnystefy; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #36 2011-08-27 05:12:19
Re: Sequences!yes but i haven't done many.that's where your help part comes in. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #37 2011-08-27 05:43:41
Re: Sequences!Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #38 2011-08-27 05:49:24
Re: Sequences!hi
Not if your goal is to fly to London.but if your goal is to build a plane that can fly to london,now that's a different thing.and there's no math in there. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #39 2011-08-27 05:52:16
Re: Sequences!Some things you just do a few times and after that you let technology handle it. For instance; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #40 2011-08-27 05:55:13
Re: Sequences!hi The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #41 2011-08-27 05:59:46
Re: Sequences!Everybody does that once in their life. I once did the calculation for 500 light years in terms of miles. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #42 2011-08-27 06:07:05
Re: Sequences!u see i like it when i ask someone to give me a number and then i take a square root of it by hand. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #43 2011-08-27 06:24:56
Re: Sequences!A Taylor series in its most basic form is an attempt to approximate some function by a really big polynomial. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #44 2011-08-27 08:06:29
Re: Sequences!that i know. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #45 2011-08-27 08:10:32
Re: Sequences!Yes, but do you know what that really means? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #46 2011-08-27 08:31:58
Re: Sequences!I love them. the approximation proving is intense, it's like love. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #47 2011-08-27 08:38:20
Re: Sequences!That is actually the secondary by far aspect of them. They were created to compute things. Numbers! Fact is we know everything about polynomials and little about any non - linear function. It is only natural to want to represent everything in terms of polynomials. Your calculator, computer and all the guys used them for precisely that purpose. The whole field of numerical analysis is really nothing more than a study of taylor series. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #48 2011-08-27 08:42:47
Re: Sequences!You know the value sin(x)=0 then you derivate both sides and get sin(x) = p. then you just derivate on and on... I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #49 2011-08-27 20:16:59
Re: Sequences!hi LQ The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #50 2011-08-28 18:33:20
Re: Sequences!Can any one hep me to find the solution for this |