You are not logged in.
Hi bobbym,
Okay.
Do they use different codes for main edition and student edition?
Hi anonimnystefy,
See post #56.
Also:
Last edited by gAr (20110629 01:54:46)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
isnt it a^x in(a)
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
Offline
Yes, it is. A print error!
Corrected it.
Last edited by gAr (20110629 01:55:17)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
ah,okay.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
Offline
Hi gAr;
Since they are addon packages I would say yes.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
Of course that result can be rigorously obtained, but who cares?
Combinatorics is Algebra and Algebra is Combinatorics.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Okay.
Are you going to report that problem?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
I have reported many problems to both Mathematica and Maple. I was a beta tester for Mupad. These experiences left me with bad feeling for reporting errors. They do not listen.
There is a guy I knew. Pretty good mathematician. He finds hundreds of errors in all packages. He is generally not taken seriously.
I like the packages, I do not like the corporations that produce them. I like mathematics but do not like mathematicians. I like science but find scientists reprehensible.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
Of course that result can be rigorously obtained, but who cares?
Combinatorics is Algebra and Algebra is Combinatorics.
Offline
Okay.
Maybe someone would have already reported that by now!
FOSS is the future (for me, now itself;)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Did not mean to sound so negative. Perhaps it is not as bad as I see it. Just seems that everything has become so commercialized. Only money counts and how to get it as quickly as possible.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
Of course that result can be rigorously obtained, but who cares?
Combinatorics is Algebra and Algebra is Combinatorics.
Offline
Yeah, that's true.
That's why I have decided to stay away from costly habits.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
8)
Last edited by 123ronnie321 (20110629 19:41:58)
Offline
Good idea! Most habits rot your brain. Over here they are trying to make eating a costly habit.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
Of course that result can be rigorously obtained, but who cares?
Combinatorics is Algebra and Algebra is Combinatorics.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Eating is becoming a costly habit here too. So I would add an exception!
Hi 123ronnie321,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
9)
One confounding limit!
Last edited by gAr (20110629 22:36:12)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
7)
Message
Hi gAr,
Nice and well explained solution to Post no. 23.My attempt at 7
Message
Hi 123ronnie321,
That's correct, good job!
Actually, the last line of the solution is wrong, as it violates
the Order of Operations.
It must use grouping symbols, such as

Last edited by reconsideryouranswer (20110629 04:53:20)
Signature line:
I wish a had a more interesting signature line.
Offline
Hi,
Yes, thanks for checking.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
10)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi reconsideryouranswer,
You are right. I have done the changes. Thank you.
Offline
Last edited by 123ronnie321 (20110629 20:36:47)
Offline
Hi 123ronnie321,
Both are correct, good work!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
11)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
Can you show me your solution for #9? You can hide it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
Of course that result can be rigorously obtained, but who cares?
Combinatorics is Algebra and Algebra is Combinatorics.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In #89 the problem looks like this:
I have to blow it up because on firefox it is difficult to see it.
Is that a z in the exponent?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
Of course that result can be rigorously obtained, but who cares?
Combinatorics is Algebra and Algebra is Combinatorics.
Offline
Ugh, I wrote z there?
So uncool, I'll correct it!
Even I couldn't see it properly.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline