Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #1 20101114 00:41:55
ChallengeAll u hv to do is find functions satisfying  #2 20101114 10:04:00
Re: ChallengeHi 123ronnie321; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #3 20101116 02:17:57
Re: Challengei did it this way Last edited by 123ronnie321 (20101122 03:01:15) #4 20101116 04:56:50
Re: ChallengeThat does not give you the analytical answer. Do you know what those series represent? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #5 20101117 18:25:56
Re: Challengehi bobby #6 20101118 00:09:24
Re: ChallengeHi; Where 1,w1 and w2 are the roots of unity. Same answer as I got. But that is not how I did it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #7 20101120 16:40:15
Re: Challengehello friend in my openion you are wrong in frist question #8 20101120 16:57:35
Re: ChallengeHi sameer mishra;
Comments like that are kind of confusing. Can you be more specific. We both have names which will help to differentiate us from each other. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 