Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #1 20101104 08:58:35
No hairtheorem wrongSince quantum entanglement includes entropy it must evaporate somewhere from the black hole in order for it to loose all its energy. Last edited by LQ (20101104 09:45:21) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #2 20101104 13:09:03
Re: No hairtheorem wrongHair? Is that a new Hawking term, Hawking Hair?! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #3 20101104 20:43:26
Re: No hairtheorem wrongSomething to do with that quantum entanglement doesn't seem to leave the black hole. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #4 20101105 05:11:36
Re: No hairtheorem wrongHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #5 20101105 23:31:33
Re: No hairtheorem wrongWell for any black hole to dissolve into something else then the original matter, wouldn't it be needing a direction of movement over which it can change, no matter how that or those direction(s) would possibly look? Last edited by LQ (20101105 23:48:27) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #6 20101106 04:58:40
Re: No hairtheorem wrongHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #7 20101106 05:44:40
Re: No hairtheorem wrongWell. What if it takes alot shorter then that? Hear me out. Last edited by LQ (20101106 06:34:24) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #8 20101106 05:50:55
Re: No hairtheorem wrongHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9 20101106 06:11:16
Re: No hairtheorem wronghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #10 20101106 06:26:22
Re: No hairtheorem wrongHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11 20101106 06:32:51
Re: No hairtheorem wrongWell I simply meant that 2 photons became entangled and left eachother, one entering the black hole, let me edit, w8 I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #12 20101106 07:16:35
Re: No hairtheorem wrongHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #13 20101106 07:57:21
Re: No hairtheorem wrongImagine that the more dimensions you use, the faster is the quantum entanglement transmitted, since the transmitting particles are still hooped but less of them, So basically you are sending the information in a more straight line then 4D space, since you send the information over directions in space in which they intersept quicker. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #14 20101106 08:34:23
Re: No hairtheorem wrongIf 2 photons became entangled and split up, one entering the black hole, what if the whole black hole becomes entangled due to that time doesn't pass in a black hole? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #15 20101106 08:51:08
Re: No hairtheorem wrongHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #16 20101106 09:13:13
Re: No hairtheorem wrongSurely quantum entangled information must carry entropy and thus energy? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... 