Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2009-05-07 05:54:09#2 2009-05-07 06:32:43#3 2009-05-08 03:46:01#4 2009-05-10 08:44:56
Re: Nilpotent groupsI have the strange feeling that people are not paying attention to what I am saying. Last edited by JaneFairfax (2009-05-12 02:49:50) #5 2009-05-10 09:08:51
Re: Nilpotent groupsNo, I read all posts. Last edited by bobbym (2009-05-11 19:59:42) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #6 2009-05-11 01:44:40
Re: Nilpotent groupsI've been reading it all, in anticipation of learning group theory before I start university (I plan to start learning as soon as my A levels are over). #7 2009-05-12 03:13:03
Re: Nilpotent groupsAt the moment, I am reading about semidirect products and wreath products in my group-theory book – and trying to get my head round the definitions. This is definitely not a topic for the faint-hearted. |