Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2015-10-19 12:04:07

Primenumbers
Member
Registered: 2013-01-22
Posts: 131

A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

p=any number ending in 3

check p is not a square

where a+b is a factor and a-b is another factor

if p is prime you will not find any factors

if p is composite you will find factors.

Example:
p=33
27*33=891



46+35=81=27*3    46-35=11
factors for 33 are 3 and 11


"Time not important. Only life important." - The Fifth Element 1997

Offline

#2 2016-04-16 19:54:02

thickhead
Member
Registered: 2016-04-16
Posts: 1,086

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

This can be disproved. if a and b are integers a+b and  a-b  are either both odd or both even. Therefore the product a^2-b^2  is either odd or divisible by 4. so if p is only divisible by 2 say 10 it is not possible to find a and b.( I mean 27p can be factorized into 2 odd or 2 even numbers.)

Last edited by thickhead (2016-04-16 19:56:35)


{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}

Offline

#3 2016-04-22 21:07:29

Primenumbers
Member
Registered: 2013-01-22
Posts: 131

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

Sorry, this theorem only works with ODD numbers. So p is odd and a is either odd or even and b is the opposite.


Another way of proving p is prime is;

only when a-b=1
So add possible
to p and see if it = a square.
(a+b) and (a-b) will be factors

This is because for any odd Non-Prime that has a factor of >1, it can be produced with the below formula;

only when (x - y) can be> 1

I can prove it

x = (f + L)/2
y = (f - L)/2 therefore

   and

minus the two and it = fL which are the two factors....
And x - y = ((f + L)/2) - ((f - L)/2) = L which must be >1 for p to Not be, Prime or 1.

Last edited by Primenumbers (2016-04-22 21:08:56)


"Time not important. Only life important." - The Fifth Element 1997

Offline

#4 2016-04-22 22:08:08

Nehushtan
Member
Registered: 2013-03-09
Posts: 905
Website

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

Oh well, never mind.

Last edited by Nehushtan (2016-04-23 02:56:59)


Blog
222 books currently added on Goodreads

Offline

#5 2016-04-22 23:13:31

thickhead
Member
Registered: 2016-04-16
Posts: 1,086

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

I am sorry. I had not noticed that p is a number ending in 3.


PRIME NUMBERS WROTE
" p= any prime number ending with 3. Check p is not a square." This is redundant. No square will end with 3.


{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}

Offline

#6 2016-04-22 23:27:03

Primenumbers
Member
Registered: 2013-01-22
Posts: 131

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

Of course p does have those possible squares. But ONLY those. To see if p is composite, test all values for b where b is greater than 1and smaller than (p - 1)/2.


"Time not important. Only life important." - The Fifth Element 1997

Offline

#7 2016-04-23 00:00:04

Nehushtan
Member
Registered: 2013-03-09
Posts: 905
Website

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

Let's try a little exercise:

 
 
 
 

Last edited by Nehushtan (2016-04-23 02:56:29)


Blog
222 books currently added on Goodreads

Offline

#8 2016-04-23 00:39:04

Primenumbers
Member
Registered: 2013-01-22
Posts: 131

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

Nehushtan wrote:

 
 
 
 

I don't really know how to do this. 4k+2 will always be even so n will be any odd no. My formula doesn't work for even no.'s. So n has factors f and L where a=(f+L) /2 and b=(f-L) /2. For a prime the only factors will be 1 and itself, so the only occurrence for a squared minus b squared will be when a=(p+1)/2 and b=(p-1)/2. For a composite b will be less than this.


"Time not important. Only life important." - The Fifth Element 1997

Offline

#9 2016-04-23 01:08:13

Nehushtan
Member
Registered: 2013-03-09
Posts: 905
Website

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

It doesn't matter.

Last edited by Nehushtan (2016-04-23 02:55:54)


Blog
222 books currently added on Goodreads

Offline

#10 2016-04-23 01:15:38

Primenumbers
Member
Registered: 2013-01-22
Posts: 131

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

Primenumbers wrote:

For a prime the only factors will be 1 and itself, so the only occurrence for a squared minus b squared will be when a=(p+1)/2 and b=(p-1)/2. For a composite b will be less than this.


"Time not important. Only life important." - The Fifth Element 1997

Offline

#11 2016-04-23 03:04:37

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

Hi;

I have received two complaints about this thread and that is three too many.

Sir Isaac Newton wrote:

Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy.

@Nehushtan: Please try to think of the other guys feelings when you respond. No more "rubbish" comments.

@Primenumbers: Please try to be more receptive when someone points out a possible error. Supposedly you are posting so that you can get feedback on your work. This is valuable to us all. Welcome criticism when you get it, this is how we all learn.

So I say, calm down everyone. Everyone knows the rules and everyone knows me.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

#12 2016-04-23 03:22:21

googol
Member
From: Delft, The Netherlands
Registered: 2016-04-22
Posts: 13

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

Every composite number is the difference of two squares, a prime is never:

In your example



10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Offline

#13 2016-04-23 04:03:58

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

@Nehushtan

Did you read post #11? Using Einstein to demean a member is clever but still not allowed. Please stop deleting your posts and my additions in those posts.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

#14 2016-04-25 04:32:44

Primenumbers
Member
Registered: 2013-01-22
Posts: 131

Re: A New Way Of Finding If "p" Is Composite.

Primenumbers wrote:

p=any number ending in 3

check p is not a square

where a+b is a factor and a-b is another factor

Number ending in 3: factors end in 1 and 3, or 7 and 9. Times by 27 factors now end in 1 and 1.
f=10c+1 L=10d+1
b=(10c+1-10d-1)/2=5(c-d)

where m is a square

Last edited by Primenumbers (2016-04-25 04:37:54)


"Time not important. Only life important." - The Fifth Element 1997

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB