Math Is Fun Forum

wow, that's really great.

thanks for your suggestion.will try that after my exams are over.

yes i followed it.
if it would have been equal, the entire equation would have been not defined.

m and n are equal.

thanks bobbym

trig-ing..
nice word bob.

it will always be a chair for other people except you until you install changes in it because that is what they have been hearing from their childhood and changing that requires both a lot of time and effort.

but how can we imply this scenario in organic chemistry? do you mean that we can do something new to already defined rules for nomenclature?but it won't be acceptable as the rules which i have studied till now hold good for almost all situation and are revised well by chemists across the world.

pls. explain clearly if I have not got what you exactly meant to say.

the way bob drew the structure is right.
The actual structure will contain bonds at an angle which he mentioned as approx 109° but then we generally draw the structure of carbon compounds like the one made above.

from where did this rule come? we divide 1 by infinity in physics for solving some of the numericals in lens, as it is the far point of the eye.

hmm. i see.

we are ready to help, i suppose.

leave it I was just joking.
But I really appreciate your work.
You did a good job and I feel a thread should be opened to honor them.

thanx.
that was really good.