Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#801 Re: Help Me ! » Mobius Strip: 2D or 3D? » 2007-08-22 17:27:51

LQ

But do not forget: a sphere cannot exist without a ball. Or can it O-o

#802 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » How do I make a laser with the frequency 0.0000116? » 2007-08-22 17:23:32

LQ

It was my plan to test a theory i have made by making a such a laser and directing it from north to south pool and see if its power magnify a bit.

#803 Re: Help Me ! » Mobius Strip: 2D or 3D? » 2007-08-21 21:29:56

LQ

Yes, a sphere with two dimensions, it bends over the nothingness, see?

#804 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » How do I make a laser with the frequency 0.0000116? » 2007-08-21 19:14:19

LQ

how come, what difference would it make if they intersected?

#805 Re: Introductions » Is It Dat I Is Stupid? » 2007-08-21 07:03:24

LQ

The best way is to make a good guess how many times the divident goes in the number you want to devide, then multiply the guess with the divident and subtract that from the number you are dividing and add the guess to the final answer of how many times the divident goes in that number, and whatever you have left from the subtraction you do the same thing with.

#806 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » How do I make a laser with the frequency 0.0000116? » 2007-08-20 18:48:38

LQ

Sure, 25844177413793,103 meters. Is it possible and how do I make it? The frequency should be measured in iron, btw.

#809 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » True negative gain? » 2007-08-15 01:55:36

LQ

Well you better prepare yourself cause we are in the matrix and our rare ends means bacon to them. Atleast that's what they think they mean.

#810 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » True negative gain? » 2007-08-15 00:59:13

LQ

I don't watch youtube, it's totally perverted.

#811 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » The Atom Smasher » 2007-08-15 00:02:31

LQ

Well, what was his most common expression?

#812 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » True negative gain? » 2007-08-14 20:33:53

LQ

An objects present would be a start without it's past, wouldn't it?
Well where is the objects past?

#813 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » The Atom Smasher » 2007-08-14 04:18:55

LQ

So... When will they make this exciting black hole? Do we have to wait long? I wont be able to make my higgsboson fusion apparatus on that short time interval though.

#814 Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » How do I make a laser with the frequency 0.0000116? » 2007-08-13 03:15:50

LQ
Replies: 12

It must be driven with only a few batteries, the intensity of the photon beem's magnetic field should be higher then any photons in particular in the beam, and The width of the beam must be higher then an atoms diameter.

And I would need to know how many batteries I need.

#815 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » True negative gain? » 2007-08-12 19:48:02

LQ

Even though you don't remember it, the acting will still be a part of you.

#816 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » True negative gain? » 2007-08-12 02:16:26

LQ

Yeah, well how do you reverse +experience?

#817 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » True negative gain? » 2007-08-07 03:28:35

LQ

Experience is made of +things and it cannot diverge, cause then your not experiencing.
It's not other objects that are the happiness to you
A pain is a hum hum that tells you no more hum hum. hum hum is gain.
You have never experience -(hum hum), it's bogus it does not exist.

#818 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » True negative gain? » 2007-08-02 09:54:36

LQ

First i wouldn't like to comment the "loads of stuff that fits in your brain cannot be held by hand" philosophy

Then secondly the whole "I think a picture can be conscious" thingy is just beyond me. I don't think so.

I will change my signature and see if you agree with that one atleast this time.

#819 Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » True negative gain? » 2007-08-02 04:08:53

LQ
Replies: 18

Imagine that each braincell has its own perspective and do not experience other particles change, any reaction in the brain is hence picturelike and not percepted by any one cell, instead the reality we percept is caused by an reality inducer. Then here's a mind experiment:

"If no one can have a true negative gain in their hand (like -2 apples), then neither can you be a negative gain, nor can anyone make you more negative in that which you have gained."

Is that true?

#821 Maths Is Fun - Suggestions and Comments » Theoryforums.com WANT!! WANT!!! » 2007-07-23 20:47:46

LQ
Replies: 1

Can't someone some day make that forum? (not here ofcourse) It would be very popular. Totally stupid ofcourse but very popular.

#822 Re: This is Cool » x triangled » 2007-07-19 06:51:20

LQ

Is that picture you have as an avatar really you?

And to your question, tetraheds can contain milk. Now that i've said that... Have a nice time.

#823 Re: Jokes » Spanish class » 2007-07-19 02:46:47

LQ

Both are right, Computers are gay smile

Kidding. Sure the girls won.

#824 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Graviton to photon convertion » 2007-07-18 17:42:35

LQ

That, and a EM-field. That's why we simulate it, remember?

#825 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Graviton to photon convertion » 2007-07-18 05:56:35

LQ

If you can simulate spinning for gravitons in a way that would make sence under Maxwell's laws if they were spinning in the way photons have this property, then they would become photons, cause there would be no difference in them.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB