You are not logged in.
Add to that That Is Correct!
Just don't push the button if it ain't quite one, cause then your dumbweed brain has contributed enough to mankind.
Since truly know is truly be, Truly be is truly know, and hence a thing knows what it is
So a things true nature is its integral. To know what a thing is you must integrate it, it is its answer, moreover to know a things answer, you must integrate the thing itself.
Hence the answer of every question is its integral.
Jaaah! Hehe! "Do not touch my veeeeeryy Large NUMBER!"
Is it allright or is it dumb? Perhaps both? Yeah? I thought it was cool!
The position which is nearest all the ones or zeroes
So a mean value of all the positions of the 0's or 1's?
so that (distance = d) 1/d(1,1) + 1/d(1,2) + 1/d(1,3)... +1/d(1,n) = 0, and left and right of the position is positive versus negative, hence distance d, can be negative or positive, depending on what side of the position.
How could 1/d(1,1) ... 1/d(1,n) = 0? First off, d(1,1) = 0, so I assume you just included that term by accident. But 1/d(1, 2) ... 1/d(1, n) are all positive, since 1 < 2...n.
No, Left to right; d is the distance, d(1,3) is the distance to the third digit in the code and allright, some function disjunction there POSSIBLY.
What is codesize? The number of symbols in a language? Or perhaps the size of what you're attempting to zip?
What are vicinity of 0 and 1?
1. Machine Code digits; their number! (OK?)
2. The position which is nearest all the ones or zeroes, so that (distance = d) 1/d(1,1) + 1/d(1,2) + 1/d(1,3)... +1/d(1,n) = 0, and left and right of the position is positive versus negative, hence distance d, can be negative or positive, depending on what side of the position.
Codesize & vincinity of 1 & vincinity of 0 has one code solution I postulate
Whereas vincinity of 1 is the middle of the ones and
Vincinity of 0 well you get the idea. DO I need SAY MORE?
Secondly, to find the vincinities, you need a homogen magnetic field with the same fieldlines as the ones alternatively the zeroes, and run electrons along it to be filtered in a shiffer, and the electron that runs straight is the "vincinity", which also pierce the shiffer straight through.
Hence you have saved perhaps many million years of calculations.
Thereafter, it is a piece of cake to figure out where the ones and zeroes are, I figure, given the speed of the electron. You could just aswell register it!
Quick answer!
No.
Thank you for that one Zach. What's up with the new plastic MathsIsFun? Would you give me an adress?
My source on how strong gravitomagnetism is is here:
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg19225771.800-gravitys-secret.html
Copy it and paste it into the adress window.
The need of pure water is great in the world I am tought.
If gravitomagnetism is trillions of times stronger in superconductors, can they be used to clean water from salt and dirt?
Give me a rough quick answer on this one.
So "mathwritings.com" with an 's' would be too much beging for it?
MathScribbles, Scribbledown.net
TheScribbledown.org
www.scribble.com
"do you sphere?"
MathWrighting.com?
Well if it has 2 different properties, then ye could seperate them, but the property passing sticks like glue to all things
I am dissinclined to acquiesce your request. I haven't been myself the last few years; wonders how. When a man is left outside society to die, with nothing but a medicine and the doctors word it's the right one, well the medicine is not much to eat, but after a few years that medicin is starting to look really unfriendly. So I waded out into the surfwebb until all the forum members became acclimated to my pressence, and then I rafted together some logic and made a signature, and for rope I used some synapses. From my brain.
Follow the code...
Like Gurrdish is totaly awesome. She temporarily moved to biggest idol status
Yes, and I edited, no big deal though, you practically knew what I meant
(edit: had E´ instead of E)
{kx´ = E´
gives us that: kx + C = E
If x=3 then E = 3k
Obviously;
{Every object's energy increase with time
{The total amount of energy is constant
Which gives us: The objects with energy are fusioning together.
Excellent question. a novice is some sort of beginner:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=sv&rlz=1T4HPEB_sv___SE223&defl=en&q=define:novice&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title
1. You like hard pressies, like DVD-players, right?
2. It will connect your neurons so that you can have more gainy reactions in your brain.
3. Please do. As long as it is nothing bad
Hey, Ricky!
Can it be determined backwards then?
Edit: Some errors fixed.
Well I was thinking, for instance in chemistry, the latest chapter questions, hardest first and that would be bound to work.
Then in math their opinion on how you solve a mathproblem, I have no concrete examples. You only sort them on how they answer, there are no certain answers in the sorting.
I smithed together this simple method today, the following method:
Ask 10 (or X in general) groupsorting questions, hardest first.
All who agreed with the first answer and "knew" the same answer as the questioned make a group, the group is not questioned again unless it is too big.
Ask it to some other student and yet another group can form.
Repeat with next question.
Withing the group, one at a time interpret the text read to eachother silently for later discussion purpose.
Then discuss one at a time silently in the group all the same sentence, sentence for sentence.
Questions that arise are asked to the teacher by handraising.
Please give comments and good advice. Perhaps some other good teaching methods please.
Meh, I just need some cord, a couple of batteries, a radiotransmitter manual and an optic physic book, and then I need to buy a chopter ticket to a pole.
Sure. Shouldn't be too hard. Only I'd have to brush up my fysics&maths classes.