You are not logged in.
I think want to avoid using a table for proving it's a tautology.
To whom?
Maybe we should try axiomatizing real life before going any further into discussion. I bet that if we succeeded, Hilbert would have been proud.
I do. I love it so much! Need to catch up on a few of the latest ones.
Hi ganesh
There is not need t define definition yet.
Agnishom is a particular element of the set P called people.
Ah, okay, I get it.
Define purpose and maybe it will.
Hi Agnishom
In the example, isn't 70-60>8?
Mathematics is a superset of reality, so, yes, you do.
I doubt that claim. Can you show that using two different methods?
Well, the two of you are not real. That would make Newton not real as well?
And you. There were more before us.
Snails should live in the basement.
This sounds like actuarial maths.
I've heard of him, but I had no idea what he looked like.
Hi ganesh
Hm, he's deceased, I presume?
Of course, post away.
Okay, see you half an hour ago.
Well, it's fine, I searched that name first, too.
Want to pose one now?
No, that person does not exist. But I remember that we mentioned her.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karatsuba_algorithm
Right there, in the second sentence.
Hmmm, I like snails.
Hi Uma Maheswar Nakka
Welcome to the forum! ![]()