You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I did the base case and was able to do the s(k) but when I was doing the s(k+1) I got lost for the LHS
Offline
hi broncos18
Welcome to the forum.
Does it have to be proved by induction?
My method, hint:
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob ![]()
Offline
Yes, this problem has to be proved by induction
Offline
OK.
So we'll assume the n-1 th case
Get both fractions over the same denominator:
I've left a few ??? for you to complete. Can you finish it from here?
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob ![]()
Offline
Is it
Offline
Yes, that's good for the first ???
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob ![]()
Offline
Offline
That's it!
Just cancel an 'n'.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob ![]()
Offline
Pages: 1