You are not logged in.
I noticed that when you use a dark background for your color scheme, LaTeX comes out looking really awful. Why does it do this?
Also perhaps it'd be a good idea to disable any keys but the number keys to be typed in the box, which will lessen keyboard typos like accidentally pressing the top row of letters or any key which is close to a number. Just a thought.
I'd agree, except that laptops don't have a keypad (unless you hold the "fn" key down).
Also, just assign some value to Mike for purposes of example (let's say he's got 5). Now subtract 2 from that to get 3 (Jen's number of cards). Next, add 3 to Mike's number and subtract 3 from Jen's number. That leaves you with Mike having 8 and Jen having none. 8-0=8, so John's answer is correct.
Nope, you're not reinventing the wheel.
Try www.coolmath.com. There's also a book out called "Great Problems And Their Mathematicians" that shows the practical applications for a lot of solutions for problems.
This website also has a lot.
Would there be any way to filter out quotes in character count in posts? I see a lot this happening:
Somebody else wrote:[very long, good, well-thought out post, example being LQ's "The Self Defined As A Property Of Existing Stuff]
cool
I think that people do this to up postcount. So, again, could you filter out quotes in character count?
However, I do agree with his claim that fake science is rampant in commercials. I always think of those commercials saying that "hair is 50% shinier using this shampoo...". How do they measure shininess (not sure if that's a real word )?
How many software engineers does it take to replace a lightbulb?
-None, it's a hardware issue.
How many mathematicians does it take to replace a lightbulb?
-None, it's possible to prove that it can be done, though...
-3. One proves it exists, one reduces it to a problem already solved, one proves it can be done, and one actually does it. (EDIT: Yay, I can count. It's actually 4.:P)
How many civil engineers does it take to replace a lightbulb?
-4. One builds a bridge to the lightbulb, one load tests it, one builds another building to get off of the bridge afterwards, and one tells another guy to replace it.
Anyone have any more?
So 10=e+f and e>f. Let's focus on the first one. The pairs for e and f can be:
0,10
1,9
2,8
3,7
4,6
5,5
6,4
7,3
8,2
9,1
10,0
But since e>f, those pairs are not valid until e>5. So e>5.
EDIT: I'm assuming that he needs this to work for all real numbers. My working still works, though.
Recently, I got thinking about what
You were missing a } on line 2 after \frac{1}{i} - Ricky
The only problem is if there's a minimum age people need to be to check exercises. Then I don't think I'd have much of a chance of getting in.
I'd be happy to check exercises (although my computation is not that great) up to Algebra II, basic trigonometry, and basic calculus.
1. There are many uses, one of which being they are useful for astronomy when you need to multiply big numbers.
2. One that comes to mind is the number of bacteria in a petri dish. As the numbers increase, it gets more and more full in the petri dish, making it more crowded and less bacteria can survive.
I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean the solution or the coefficients?
It's great! I especially like the slider part for quick calculations.
I remember working on a problem like this, except they spoke English, there were two of them, and you needed to get through a certain door that one of them were guarding. The answer was to ask one of them what the other one would say to a certain question. I think that could be adapted to this problem.
By the way, Simon, it's interesting that our user names are one letter off from each other.
Ack! I took another look and realized that the law of cosines doesn't work here.
I'm assuming this is a trigonometry problem. Use the law of cosines because this is not a right triangle (as far as I can tell. I can't read the degrees. Enlarging anyone?).
First, multiply 55 by 6. Add that to 1000 (10 times 100). Now divide that by 16. That's your answer.
Great job, Jane!
Well, then you need trigonometry.
Nice guess, JohnnyReinB!
Guess 1 (528): 3c
OK, I've got a number (unless anyone else wants to lead). Good luck!
Does that answer your question? Do I need to elaborate?
I agree with luca's "truncated cone" idea although if we're talking about those circles, it's a conic section.