You are not logged in.
Can you please explain the De Moivre's theorem?
Yes, but now I come to do so I've realised that I was using something related but not de Moivre's theorem itself.
I'll do my formula* first. * I'm not claiming it's named for me, but just that it's what I was using.
Suppose you have a complex number a + ib.
r is called the modulus of the complex number and theta its argument. You can move between the a + ib version of the complex number and the modulus argument version using
Now suppose you have a second complex number with modulus s and argument phi and multiply them together
Thus, for any two complex numbers the modulus of the product is the product of the moduli and the argument of the product is the sum of the arguments.
Bob
Would you like to see the real de moivre also?
I've now tried it and it is very 'messy'.
a = 13i b = 1 c = -101
Is that sufficient for an answer? I checked with Wolfram alpha and that's the answer it gave.
If you've got another hour or so to spare, it is possible to find the complex square root of any number using De Moivre's theorem.
First find the modulus and argument of the complex number.
A square root will have a modulus that is the square root of the above mod. and an argument that is half the argument of the above.
That's where it gets messy. I had hoped it would come out to a 'nice, easy' number but it doesn't.
Bob
I looked it up. I'll think about why it works later. ![]()
First calculate the Sun's declination:
The declination of the sun is:
δ = 23.45° * sin( (360° / 365) * (n + 284) )
where "δ" represents the declination angle, and "n" is the day of the year with January 1st being day 1 (where we are in the leap year cycle has a negligible effect on this).
Next calculate the Sun's maximum altitude:
A=90−(φ−δ)
where
A is the altitude of the sun (degrees)
φ is the latitude of the observer (degrees)
δ is the declination of the sun (degrees)
Use a clock set to your local time rather than the Country time across the time zone. You can calculate this using your longitude. The Earth rotates 15° per hour. I live East of Greenwich so, for me, the Sun is 'ahead' of GMT by about 3 minutes. The altitude value occurs when the Sun is due South of the observer (for the Northern hemisphere).
There is another factor that will alter the local noon value because of small inaccuracies due to the elliptical nature and tilt of the Earth's orbit. This shifts local noon by some minutes but is only about 15 minutes at worst so you can probably skip this factor. (ref: the equation of time)
I think that's all you need.
Bob
I've been thinking some more about this.
Keen astronomers get an 'equatorial mount' for their telescope. The mount can rotate in two ways. One of the axes is set to point at the pole star. The other allows the astronomer to point at a star and then follow it as the Earth rotates. The polar axis rotation can automatically rotate at the right speed using a suitable motor.
Following the Sun would need a similar arrangement. The reason the Sun moves across the sky is totally due to the rotation of the Earth so, once you are pointing at the Sun, you'll need to rotate your device around the polar axis. The angle between the polar axis and the horizontal is the latitude.
There must be a reasonably simple formula for fixing the angle between the polar axis and a line pointing towards the Sun. Don't know what it is yet but I'm hopeful I can work it out or look it up if the former fails. It will depend on the date.
Bob
Definitely possible. Let all 28 meet in one place. (They can move on to other houses for each course if you want.)
So I also think that somewhere between 7 meeting at a place and 28 meeting at a place there is the optimum solution which I take to be the minimum at each place subject to all meeting all at least once.
Trouble is I cannot find it.
Bob
hi KerimF
No to both. I've made a simple diagram that will start to explain this. It's definitely NOT to scale. It shows the Earth in orbit around the Sun going anticlockwise. The parallel lines mark the polar axis (ie the axis that the Earth rotates around) with North at the top. (If you were looking down on the North Pole that rotation is anticlockwise too.)

This means that at mid-summer the northern hemisphere of the Earth is 'leaning' towards the Sun which is why it's warmer then for folks that live there. Sunlight strikes the southern hemisphere at a lower angle so it gets less hot there.
6 months later the situation is reversed which is why it's summer then in the Southern hemisphere.
The angle between the polar axis and the plane of the Earth's orbit around the Sun (called the plane of the ecliptic) is about 67°. This year the 20th Of March is the Spring equinox. The exact date varies a bit because of leap years. On that date and at noon the Sun will be exactly overhead the equator and the day length is 12 hours. After that date the Sun is overhead of places north of the equator, gradually 'moving' north to the summer solstice when it is overhead points on the line of latitude called the tropic of Cancer. Then it gradually 'moves' back towards the equator at the Autumnal equinox. In winter the Sun at noon is lowest in the sky reaching its lowest at the Winter solstice .
So the angle between the Sun and the horizon depends on the observer's latitude and the date in the year.
If you're hoping to point a solar panel directly at the Sun for different dates then I need to know your latitude.
Bob
ps. I don't like the common practice of using the term 12 AM. AM is an abbreviation of the Latin phrase ante meridiem which translates as 'before noon'. So how can 12 before noon make any sense. We already have a perfectly good term for this moment in time. It's 12 noon. PM stand for post meridiem which means after noon. So for the next 11 hours and 59 minutes it's after noon and at exactly 12 hours later it's 12 midnight and definitely not 12 PM. In some parts of the world 12 AM and 12 PM have the opposite meanings which also shows why neither term should be used.
hi rossrossolimo
Welcome to the forum.
The quadratic formula will still work here.
Bob
Thanks. Don't laugh ... I'm using Windows 11 on my laptop.
Bob
There are 28 people who are going to share a four course meal. But not all in the same place. Some will go first to house 1, while others are in house 2 etc. There are 4 houses. Then they shuffle who goes where for the next course.
So the challenge is to come up with a rotation plan so that, over the 4 courses, everyone meets everyone else for at least one of the courses.
eg if abcdefgh meet in house 1 for the first course, you might try aijklmno in house 2 for the second course.
One trivial solution is for everyone to start in house 1 for course 1, then all move on to house 2 for the next and so on.
I'm assuming that 28 in one venue is too crowded, so I'm trying to spread people out more but still meet the criteria.
As 28/4 = 7, the first thing I tried is 7 in each house. But that must fail as 'a' only meets 4 x 6 = 24 of the friends. So at least 8 in some venues is needed.
So far I haven't come up with a plan using 8 people at each venue. I think that there may be some underlying maths that either helps to a solution or proves it cannot be done but I don't know what it is. Maybe you could set up a program that runs through the possibilities???
Bob
Every morning the Sun rises in the East and in the evening sets in the west. The Sun appears to move across the sky. It's all relative.
If you set on a pendulum swinging to and fro you trace out a certain back and forth movement. But if that pendulum is itself supported by another pendulum which is also swinging the resultant motion is surprising and I think you'll enjoy discovering what it is .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPbzhxYTioM
Bob
It's here: https://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=32566
Bob
I check out all links that get posted. As far as I can remember my security software jumped in and blocked me from going there. So I researched without following the link and found warnings about it on the net.
When I put in a link I deliberately don't disguise it at all so everyone can see where I'm sending them.
Almost every day the forum gets inappropriate posts and admin or a moderator has to deal with. Annoying but it seems to be something we all have to cope with. If you spot a 'dodgy' post click the 'report' link as it flags it up to us.
Bob
When I meet a new problem for which I don't have a method, one approach that sometimes helps me is to simplify the numbers to an easier case first and see if I can establish some rules.
So far I've filled lots of sheets of paper with arrangements but not yet got anywhere. ![]()
Bob
Both are true apparently.
Yes, that's right. It's all to do with frames of reference. From the plane you will see me apparently moving backwards along with the ground, but I think I'm stationary.
So I'll see the ball end up at B as well.
So "The ball starts at position a, and ends up at position b. Absolutely." is the correct version.
Bob
What you describe sounds like a Galilean frame of reference and I'd think it would work. You could add equations that accurately give the position in orbit for the planets and moons and so we'd have a way of taking account of all the movements. I'm not sure if Einstein's theory messes with that nor if the uncertainty principle throws a spanner in, but something like that got astronauts to the Moon and back, and also all those exploration rockets that have gone out to the outer planets.
Is this the moment to remind you that the Sun is part of a spiral arm of the Galaxy which is both spinning and moving through space? It's a similar dilemma to the one that says the Earth is sitting on the back of a giant turtle. And what holds the turtle? Another larger one. And what holds that? "Oh, you don't get me like that", said the lady,"It's turtles all the way down". *
Bob
*https://apilgriminnarnia.com/2014/03/26/turtles/
Commander Bob, of Mars Fleet 25
Thanks for the promotion. Do I get a smart uniform?
The latitude/longitude coordinate system was devised specifically for navigating on the surface of the Earth. You can determine your latitude by observing the angle between the Pole star and the horizontal. Latitude is harder; if you can work out the right ascension amd declination of a star and you know the time and date, you can calculate the longitude, but not much help if you're on the Moon or Mars. No one has devised a coordinate system for the Solar System yet.
So maybe you should make one. World fame awaits. ![]()
Bob
Thanks phrontister, well spotted. If I see a post that is pure advertising I remove it and the new member/guest. This one wasn't selling anythng (I think) so I've edited it out but left Echo_23 as a member for now. It can get tricky when the 'offender' has put in actual mathematical content as I don't want to fragment the thread.
Any ideas on the dinner party post?
https://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=32566
Bob
hi Nick
Welcome to the forum.
I would like everyone to meet at least once.
I'm thinking you'd want 7 at each venue, for each course. So person A would meet 6 others each time, that's only 24. So that won't work.
Can I do it with more folk at some venues and less elsewhere? I suspect not but I'll go back to my spreadsheet and try.
Trivial solution that you won't want: Everyone goes to venue 1, then all on to venue 2 etc etc.
Bob
There's not much chance of observing uniform motion without external forces here on Earth chiefly because of friction and to a lesser extent air resistance.
In space it's happening all the time. The space craft that were shot off to escape the solar system are just continuing in the direction they were going when the fuel ran out.
And any object in orbit just keeps going. There is an external force; gravity; and that's what causes the orbit but .for example the Earth's tangential speed doesn't change significantly .
You could think about examples where the friction is very low such as in ice skating.
Bob
That's great! Wow, hasn't time flown by. I seem to remember you were a lot younger when you joined.
Anyhow, it'll be a few days before I get a chance to study it properly. I'll let you know then how I got on. Probably have to have a few things explained (to this old timer)
Bob
You could call it a throttle as that's how it works.
Once you've reached cruising speed there is still a force trying to slow you up made from wind resistance and friction so you still need to input some gas to create a force to overcome these.
Once there are no externally impressed force's Newton says we keep going at constant velocity.
Bob
underlined (... , -3,-2,- 1,0,1,2,3, ..) is the distance from point(number) 0 to the underlined number (point)
Just checking: so 3 = 3 = -3 ?
Bob
hi Marjanovic
I have now had a more careful look at your thesis. I haven't understood passed figure 2. Please explain whether 3 underlined is the space between 2 and 3, or between 3 and 4. Figure 2 does not make this clear at all.
Bob
Cool indeed! Thanks for posting.
Bob
I would call
trig identities.
Def: identity --- a formula that is true for all values of the variable(s).
https://www.mathwords.com/i/identity.htm
I started with your proof, which works if you allow tan(90) = ∞ and tan(90).tan(0) = 1 .
I just juggled the algebra to avoid messing with ∞.
Bob