You are not logged in.
Bots are said having AI because they are programmed to learn from humans, besides being an archive (sort of encyclopedia) of what are known by humans universally.
same here
Thank you, Bob. You gave me homework to think of
Hi Bob,
By the way, I had the impression that your solar watch works (± small θ) on all days of the year when the sunlight is clear. Could it be that simple?
If it is, I guess the function of the sun azimuth versus o'clock could be found empirically.
Kerim
Did you mean this:
https://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=442362#p442362
Yes, Thank you. It inspired me to think of this project (tracking the sun horizontally).
I'm glad to get onto sundial theory because I think it is going to be needed here.
The Sun appears to track along a great circle at 15° /hour. But the shadow on my sundial does not track at that rate. Only the horizontal movement affects the shadow so it is necessary to calculate each hour angle. The angle between 12 and 1 is about 12° and between 6 and 7 is about 16°. I've got the theory for this written down somewhere ... I'll dig it out.
And if you want a dial on a vertical face that too is possible but needs a different set of angles. Your tracker will need both the altitude (vertical) and azimuth (horizontal) calculations I think.
Bob
You are right. It is not simple as we like it to be.
I hope the formulas (the set of formulas) will give the azimuth and altitude (maximum, I guess) in function of date and time only, besides the laltitude and longitude of the observer
I guess, the horizontal limits will be made around ±60° for practical reasons (mechanical).
Hi, Bob
For instance, I remember you attached once a photo of your solar watch, I couldn't find its post.
Kerim
A + iB could be seen as the sum of two vectors on two perpendicular axes.
A on the real axis (horizontal).
B on the imaginary axis (vertical).
The modulus = the length of the sum vector = sqrt(A^2 + B^2) = r
The argument = its angle with the horizontal axis = arctan(B/A) = θ
The new form is usually written as:
r*e^iθ
It seems that, at best, a guest can meet 24 different guests.
In case the distribution is 7+7+7+7, a guest can meet 6 guests * 4 = 24 guests
If 8+8+8+4, a guest of the latter 4 can meet 3 + 3*7 = 24 guests
If 9+9+9+1, The latter guest can meet 0 + 3*8 = 24 guests
Is there other possibility?
You did help a lot. Thank you, Bob.
Therefore, the declination of the sun is now:
δ = 23.45° * sin( (360° / 365) * (n + 284) )
where:
n= 31+28+2 = 61 days
δ = 23.45° * sin( (360° / 365) * (61 + 284) ) = -7.914911995°
================
the Sun's maximum altitude at Aleppo city is:
A=90−(φ−δ)
where:
φ = the latitude of the observer (degrees) = 36° 12' 7'' = 36.20194444°
δ = -7.914911995°
A= 90 - (36.20194444 + 7.914911995) ≈ 45.9°
Here, it is around 5.30 PM. So, tomorrow noon, I will try to measure the angle A (though for n=62, A≈46.3°)
================
================
As I mentioned earlier, to simplify the positioner installation, I will try to move automatically the solar panel, horizontally only (The vertical movement will have to be done manually, every 3 months, for example).
In this case, if the controller's clock is set to 12 noon when the sun is at mid sky (at its maximum altitude), is it possible to calculate the sun deviation angle, θ, at 1 PM? Edited: Sorry again, you gave me the answer already which is 15° / hour (=360/24)
Thank you, Bob.
But I am sorry because I forgot to add in my first question that 'its highest elevation' is also relative to the actual arc of the sun during the daylight.
I assumed that a 'sun watch' works in summer and winter as well (blue sky), only the length of the shadow varies.
Hi Bob,
[1] Let us assume that on the 21st June at noon (12:00 AM) the sun was at its highest elevation relative to an observer on the ground. Will the sun be also at its highest elevation on the 21st December at noon to the same observer?
I mean, is it true that the sun will be at its highest elevation at noon (relative to the same observer), no matter the day of the year is?
[2] Let us assume the angle A is of the arc on which the sun moved from noon to 1:00 PM. Will this angle change on the 21st December at noon?
I mean, is it true that the sun will move the same arc angle (from its highest elevation) from noon to 1:00 PM (relative to the same observer), no matter the day of the year is?
I try to design a simple one-dimension solar positioner (much like a satellite dish positioner). The controller will have an IC for time and date. It is supposed to move the solar panel, based on the time and date, read from that IC. The vertical movement of the positioner is supposed to be made manually (to simplify its mechanical structure), say 4 positions; one for each 3-month season.
Although there are various formulas to find out the azimuth and elevation of the sun in function of time and date, the accuracy is not critical in this application.
Thank you.
Kerim
Yes.
In post #12, the solution was wrong as noted in post #15
In post #16, it is also wrong if everyone has to meet at least once.
I guess this is the solution:
Appetizer
H1: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
H2: 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
H3: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
H4: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Soup
H1: 15 23 24 25 26 27 28
H2: 22 16 17 18 19 20 21
H3: 01 09 10 11 12 13 14
H4: 08 02 03 04 05 06 07
Main
H1: 22 09 10 11 12 13 14
H2: 15 02 03 04 05 06 07
H3: 08 23 24 25 26 27 28
H4: 01 16 17 18 19 20 21
Dessert
H1: 08 16 17 18 19 20 21
H2: 01 23 24 25 26 27 28
H3: 22 02 03 04 05 06 07
H4: 15 09 10 11 12 13 14
Why do 1, 8, 15 and 22 take the same course 4 times?
Do you mean this is not allowed?
Isn’t it a solution?
Appetizer
H1: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
H2: 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
H3: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
H4: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Soup
H1: 01 09 10 11 12 13 14
H2: 08 02 03 04 05 06 07
H3: 15 23 24 25 26 27 28
H4: 22 16 17 18 19 20 21
Main
H1: 01 16 17 18 19 20 21
H2: 08 23 24 25 26 27 28
H3: 15 02 03 04 05 06 07
H4: 22 09 10 11 12 13 14
Dessert
H1: 01 23 24 25 26 27 28
H2: 08 16 17 18 19 20 21
H3: 15 09 10 11 12 13 14
H4: 22 02 03 04 05 06 07
This is what I did:
I started with the Appetizer as done by others.
I sent guest 1 to Soup at H1 where he shouldn't meet 2 to 7, so he was joined by 8 to 13.
Then I sent him to Main at H1 where he shouldn't meet 2 to 7 and 8 to 13, so he was joined by 14 to 19.
Again, I sent him to Dessert at H1 where he shouldn't meet 2 to 7, 8 to 13 and 14 to 19, so he was joined by 20 to 25.
By applying the same logic:
I sent guest 2 to Soup at H2 where he shouldn't meet 1, 3 to 7, and 9 to 13 who were at H1 (with 1), so he was joined by 14 to 19.
Then I sent him to Main at H2 where he shouldn't meet 1, 3 to 7 and 9 to 13, also 14 to 19 who were at H1 (with 1), so he was joined by 20 to 25.
Again, I sent him to Dessert at H2 where he shouldn't meet 1, 3 to 7, 9 to 13 and 14 to 19, also 20 to 25 who were at H1 (with 1), so he was joined by 26 to 28 + 8 to 10.
Similarly:
I sent guest 3 to Soup at H3 where he shouldn't meet 1, 2 and 4 to 7, also 8 to 13 (with 1) and 14 to 19 (with 2), so he was joined by 20 to 25.
Then I sent 3 to Main at H3 where he shouldn't meet 1, 2 and 4 to 7 and 9 to 13, also 14 to 19 (with 1) and 20 to 25 (with 2), so he was joined by 26 to 28 + 8 to 10.
Again, I sent 3 to Dessert at H3 where he shouldn't meet 1, 2 and 4 to 7, 20 to 25 and 26 to 28 + 8 to 10, so he was joined by 11 to 16.
But this same reasoning couldn't be applied on the guest 4 as shown below. Perhaps, other methodic steps could work
=============================
Appetizer
H1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H2: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
H3: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
H4: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Soup
H1: 1 8 9 10 11 12 13
H2: 2 14 15 16 17 18 19
H3: 3 20 21 22 23 24 25
H4: 4 26 27 28
Main
H1: 1 14 15 16 17 18 19
H2: 2 20 21 22 23 24 25
H3: 3 26 27 28 8 9 10
H4: 4
Dessert
H1: 1 20 21 22 23 24 25
H2: 2 26 27 28 8 9 10
H3: 3 11 12 13 14 15 16
H4: 4
=================
Edit: Perhaps instead of starting with 1,2,3 and 4, using 1, 8, 15 and 22 may work.
I’m dropping further support for the project. I understand that knowledge is of little value to the common people.
We used to hear: "Necessity is the mother of invention/innovation"
This means that an invention or innovation is expected to be useful to the person who needed it in the first place.
In fact, this saying applies on my work.
Once a while, I have to think out of the box when I need to design something that no one else seemed to have an interest about it.
And when I try to present what I did, no one, as expected, has an interest to know/understand it.
Similarly, if one presents his invention or innovation that I don't need, I cannot focus on it while I try to solve what I need.
This is how life is since always.
Thanks guys.
My teacher gave a solution. Would you like to see?
Why not? The beauty of math is that 'all roads lead to Rome' I mean the solution of a problem (Rome) could be reached by following different logical paths (well-done roads).
Hi Bob,
Your solution is better since it doesn't use trig identities. Thank you.
Kerim
Hi guys,
Thanks for ur answers but the question I asked was correct.
There were two questions in that exercise.
@@Prove that:
## tan(70) = 2tan(50) + tan(20)
## 2tan(70) = tan(80) - tan(10)These two questions are similar.
These are questions from Opt. Maths of 9th grade.
Of course, you asked a correct question.
We just liked to prove it in its general form:
## tan(70) = 2tan(50) + tan(20)
## tan(a) = 2tan(b) + tan(c)
The two sides are equal if'
a+c=90 and b=a-c
Similarly:
## 2tan(70) = tan(80) - tan(10)
## 2tan(b) = tan(a) - tan(c)
The two sides are equal if'
a+c=90 and b=a-c
The trick is that:
1 - tan(70)*tan(20) = 0
1 - tan(80)*tan(10) = 0
1 - tan(a)*tan(c) = 0 , if a+c = 90 , see the denominator of the identity below:
tan(a+c) = tan(90) = [ tan(a) + tan(c) ] / [ 1 - tan(a)*tan(c) ] = ∞ {a fraction equals infinity, if its denominator=0 and its denominator≠0}
Whew. Nicely done.
I was never gonna get this one.
I believe you were able to get it, if you had enough free time.
KerimF - You mean: It is like... tan(65) = 2tan(40) + tan(25)
Thank you.
The general form of the OP equation:
tan(A) = 2*tan(2*A-90) - tan(90-A) {equation 0}
Let us start with the identity:
tan(a-b) = [ tan(a) - tan(b) ] / [ 1 + tan(a)*tan(b) ]
By replacing:
a = A
b = 90-A
We get:
tan[A-(90-A)] = [ tan(A) - tan(90-A) ] / [ 1 + tan(A)*tan(90-A) ] {equation 1}
Now let us evaluate the product: tan(A)*tan(90-A)
By using the identity:
tan(a+b) = [ tan(a) + tan(b) ] / [ 1 - tan(a)*tan(b) ]
We get:
tan[A+(90-A)] = [ tan(A) + tan(90-A) ] / [ 1 - tan(A)*tan(90-A) ]
tan(90) = [ tan(A) + tan(90-A) ] / [ 1 - tan(A)*tan(90-A) ]
But tan(90) = ∞
∞ = [ tan(A) + tan(90-A) ] / [ 1 - tan(A)*tan(90-A) ] which means that the denominator of the fraction must be zero. {x/0 = ∞}
1 - tan(A)*tan(90-A) = 0
tan(A)*tan(90-A) = 1
After replacing tan(A)*tan(90-A) by 1 in {equation 1}, we get:
tan[A-(90-A)] = [ tan(A) - tan(90-A) ] / ( 1 + 1 )
tan[A-(90-A)] = [ tan(A) - tan(90-A) ] / 2
2*tan(2*A-90) = tan(A) - tan(90-A)
tan(A) = 2*tan(2*A-90) + tan(90-A) which is similar to {equation 0}
It is like... tan(65) = 2tan(45) + tan(25) [wrong] Thanks to Phrzby Phil
It is like... tan(65) = 2tan(40) + tan(25)
I am a bit busy now so I can just give a hint:
Try to draw the distance travelled by a falling object (a=g=10m/s2) versus time (assume that the downwards direction of the movement is positive). I don't think the graph will be a straight line.
Kerim