Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2008-05-11 15:05:58

SvenBee
Member
Registered: 2008-03-08
Posts: 106

Yay for a wacky proof!

All right 10 points to whomever finds the fallacy in this proof big_smile


e...the red-headed stepchild of math.

Offline

#2 2008-05-11 18:29:25

luca-deltodesco
Member
Registered: 2006-05-05
Posts: 1,470

Re: Yay for a wacky proof!

since your taking the square root, you need ±


The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.

Offline

#3 2008-05-12 01:15:40

SvenBee
Member
Registered: 2008-03-08
Posts: 106

Re: Yay for a wacky proof!

So close but not quite on target, 5 points. big_smile


e...the red-headed stepchild of math.

Offline

#4 2008-05-12 03:08:03

Daniel123
Member
Registered: 2007-05-23
Posts: 663

Re: Yay for a wacky proof!

Since we know that cos x is positive when

, and negative when
.

Offline

#5 2008-05-12 03:09:09

Dragonshade
Member
Registered: 2008-01-16
Posts: 147

Re: Yay for a wacky proof!

I guess its more like

The trick of this is that, he changed the domain and range

Offline

#6 2008-05-12 03:17:55

SvenBee
Member
Registered: 2008-03-08
Posts: 106

Re: Yay for a wacky proof!

That's correct, but the more obvious fallacy lies in the property:


This property holds true for fractional exponents as well, but only when a is positive, which is not the case for the trig function.


e...the red-headed stepchild of math.

Offline

#7 2008-05-12 03:23:18

Daniel123
Member
Registered: 2007-05-23
Posts: 663

Re: Yay for a wacky proof!

SvenBee wrote:

That's correct, but the more obvious fallacy lies in the property:


This property holds true for fractional exponents as well, but only when a is positive, which is not the case for the trig function.

It will hold for negative a if the denominator of the fractional exponent (bc) is odd (although in this case it isn't).

Last edited by Daniel123 (2008-05-12 03:27:34)

Offline

#8 2008-05-12 03:30:37

SvenBee
Member
Registered: 2008-03-08
Posts: 106

Re: Yay for a wacky proof!

Yes but whether or not the "a" is negative or positive must be established before applying the property and that's not the case here because the property is applied before pi is substituted in.


e...the red-headed stepchild of math.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB