Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2007-11-03 02:49:22

Registered: 2005-06-28
Posts: 26,416


has no solutions. This is Euler's conjecture.
This was proved many years later by a counter example by another mathematician.
(I am sorry, I don't remember the numbers in the counter example. I shall make a note of it and post later)
The counter example had numbers all greater than a million. Later on, it was also proved that any number of solutions exist in the realm of numbers after that.
Where had the one eyed cyclops, the most gifted mathematician the planet had ever seen, gone wrong?
If I remember right, he had tested numbers only upto a million. Mathematics had shown us yet again that if something is true for every number up to a million, it is not necessarily true thereafter too.

(I had read this in the book FLT by Simon Singh.)

It is no good to try to stop knowledge from going forward. Ignorance is never better than knowledge - Enrico Fermi. 

Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.


#2 2007-11-03 09:33:35

Registered: 2005-01-21
Posts: 7,686

Re: Conjecture!

I have found

95800[sup]4[/sup] + 217519[sup]4[/sup] + 414560[sup]4[/sup] = 422481[sup]4[/sup]


But nothing involving powers of 3

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..."  - Leon M. Lederman


#3 2007-11-03 11:06:05

Registered: 2005-12-04
Posts: 3,791

Re: Conjecture!

Euler also conjectured that Orthogonal Latin Squares don't exist for 4n + 6 for every n.  This is false, and while the counter example is not in the size of the millions, latin squares get very difficult to find for any number greater than 5 or so.

"In the real world, this would be a problem.  But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist.  So we'll go ahead and do that now..."


Board footer

Powered by FluxBB