You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

Pages: **1**

**TomHawk****Member**- Registered: 2007-10-16
- Posts: 4

Need some help with this problem. I have the answer, just don't understand how you get this answer.

Answer: h = A / (A + 1)

I would appreciate it if someone could show me the mechanics of this equation.

Thanks.

Offline

**TheDude****Member**- Registered: 2007-10-23
- Posts: 361

Better late than never:

This isn't really a coding problem, but here's the method anyway. From the original equation we know a couple facts about A and h. First, we know that A > 0 (strictly greater than) because ln is undefined for values of A <= 0. For the same reason we know that h > 0. However, we also know that 1 - h > 0, which implies h < 1 (again, strictly). This gives us A > 0 and 0 < h < 1.

Now, we first simplify the equation by combining the logs on the right side. ln(a) - ln(b) = ln(a / b) is a logarithmic identity, so we get ln(A) = ln(h / (1 - h) ).

Now, since the exponential function is continuous over the real numbers we can take the exponential of both sides to remove the logs and get A = h / (1 - h).

From here on out it's just algebra, but for the sake of completeness I'll go step by step. Since we know both A and h are strictly greater than 0 we can take the reciprocal of both sides to give us 1 / A = (1 - h) / h. We then split up the fraction on the right side to get 1 / A = (1 / h) - 1. Add 1 to give us 1 + (1 / A) = 1 / h --------> (A + 1) / A = 1 / h. Again, A + 1 > 0, so take the reciprocal again to give us A / (A + 1) = h QED.

*Last edited by TheDude (2007-10-24 14:52:19)*

Wrap it in bacon

Offline

**Zach****Member**- Registered: 2005-03-23
- Posts: 2,075

[ M-m-m-m-MOVED! ]

Boy let me tell you what:

I bet you didn't know it, but I'm a fiddle player too.

And if you'd care to take a dare, I'll make a bet with you.

Offline

Pages: **1**