Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #1 2006-10-25 14:22:18

ganesh
Moderator

Offline

### The mutilated Chessboard

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutilated_chessboard

Doesn't that show how rigid we mathematicans are with proofs?

Character is who you are when no one is looking.

## #2 2006-11-05 04:54:52

Patrick
Real Member

Offline

### Re: The mutilated Chessboard

I'm not sure why you think we're(mathematicians) are rigid based on that link, but it's an interresting way to solve the problem. I knew it beforehand though

Support MathsIsFun.com by clicking on the banners.
What music do I listen to? Clicky click

## #3 2006-11-05 06:48:00

Ricky
Moderator

Offline

### Re: The mutilated Chessboard

I agree with ganesh.  A typical person would try a bunch of ways, and after a while, give up concluding that there is no way to do it.

Come to think of it, my geometry teacher gave us this problem the first day of class when I was a freshman in highschool.  Pretty cool problem.

"In the real world, this would be a problem.  But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist.  So we'll go ahead and do that now..."

## #4 2006-11-05 09:08:12

Patrick
Real Member

Offline

### Re: The mutilated Chessboard

How does this make mathematicians rigid though?

Support MathsIsFun.com by clicking on the banners.
What music do I listen to? Clicky click

## #5 2006-11-08 01:13:04

ganesh
Moderator

Offline

### Re: The mutilated Chessboard

Acceptance of proofs. Mathematicians no way accept a proof unless it passes the test 100%. Not 99.99%, only 100%.

Character is who you are when no one is looking.