Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2014-05-15 02:44:56

Registered: 2011-12-01
Posts: 12

Inverse Function

Hi All

I have come across this problem and it's giving me some jip.

I have a function

I would like to be able to put in the field of view and then solve for the focal length. Is this possible, what with
there being 2 internal variables?

Many thanks in advance.


I see it, but I don't believe it.


#2 2014-05-15 04:17:27

Real Member
From: The Foundation
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 15,525

Re: Inverse Function

Not without knowing 'width' too.

“Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment


#3 2014-05-15 05:25:53

From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 86,676

Re: Inverse Function


You can solve for it but there will still be one more variable.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
Of course that result can be rigorously obtained, but who cares?
Combinatorics is Algebra and Algebra is Combinatorics.


Board footer

Powered by FluxBB