Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

Hi;

At the request of Agnishom, this thread will now deal with Fourier series and how to do them using your package.

We will start with the simple y = x between -π and π.

We have the equations:

```
f[x_] := x;
a[n_] := 1/\[Pi] Integrate[f[x] Cos[n*x], {x, -\[Pi], \[Pi]}]
b[n_] := 1/\[Pi] Integrate[f[x] Sin[n*x], {x, -\[Pi], \[Pi]}]
```

a[0],a[1],...a[4] will all be 0

b[0] = 0

b[1] = 2

b[2] = -1

b[3] = 2 / 3

b[4] = - 1 / 2

So the Fourier series is

`b[0] + b[1] Sin[x] + b[2] Sin[2 x] + b[3] Sin[3 x]+b[4] Sin[4x]`

```
Plot[{2 Sin[x] - Sin[2 x] + 2/3 Sin[3 x] - 1/2 Sin[4 x],
x}, {x, -\[Pi], \[Pi]}]
```

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

Hmm

```
(%i1) load(fourie)$
(%i2) f(x) = y$
(%i3) fourier(f,x,1);
(%t3) a = f
0
2 f sin(%pi n)
(%t4) a = --------------
n %pi n
(%t5) b = 0
n
(%o5) [%t3, %t4, %t5]
```

EDIT: Sorry, I did not see the edited portion of your last post, the last time

*Last edited by Agnishom (2014-02-20 02:55:48)*

'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

Please use Mathematica else we will get confused over differences in packages. Also follow what I did in post 1 so that you can see the workings.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

bobbym wrote:

We have the equations:

`f[x_] := x; a[n_] := 1/\[Pi] Integrate[f[x] Cos[n*x], {x, -\[Pi], \[Pi]}] b[n_] := 1/\[Pi] Integrate[f[x] Sin[n*x], {x, -\[Pi], \[Pi]}]`

```
(%i1) f(x) := x$
(%i2) a(n) := (1/%pi)*(integrate(f(x)*cos(n*x),x,-%pi,%pi))$
(%i3) b(n) := (1/%pi)*(integrate(f(x)*sin(n*x),x,-%pi,%pi))$
```

'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

bobbym wrote:

Please use Mathematica else we will get confused over differences in packages. Also follow what I did in post 1 so that you can see the workings.

OK, sorry for the confusion. I will do that when I get a chance to reboot.

'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

Hi;

This is what it looks like.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

I will do the Mathematica part once I reboot. For now, Is this ok?

```
(%i1) f(x) := x$
(%i2) a(n) := (1/%pi)*(integrate(f(x)*cos(n*x),x,-%pi,%pi))$
(%i3) b(n) := (1/%pi)*(integrate(f(x)*sin(n*x),x,-%pi,%pi))$
(%i4) b(0) + b(1)*sin(x) + b(2)*sin(2*x) + b(3)*sin(3*x)+b(4)*sin(4*x);
sin(4 x) 2 sin(3 x)
(%o4) - -------- + ---------- - sin(2 x) + 2 sin(x)
2 3
(%i5) print("Hmmm");
Hmmm
(%o5) Hmmm
(%i6) plot2d (%o4, [x, -%pi, %pi])$
```

The image is attached

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

That looks okay, very good.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

a[0],a[1],...a[4] will all be 0

So, why calculate any of them? Why declare the a[n_] function at all?

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

Because most of the time they will not be 0. Usually there are cos and sin terms.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

What does a fourier series look like without the sigma notaiton

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

Sigma notation was not used. That is a fine point. It looks like a big polynomial except powers of x are replaced with trig functions.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

Show me one such poly please.

By the way, the attached image looks interesting.

```
(%i12) b(0);(%o12) 0
(%i13) b(0) + b(1)*sin(x)
;
(%o13) 2 sin(x)
(%i14) b(0) + b(1)*sin(x) + b(2)*sin(2*x);
(%o14) 2 sin(x) - sin(2 x)
(%i15) b(0) + b(1)*sin(x) + b(2)*sin(2*x) + b(3)*sin(3*x);
2 sin(3 x)
(%o15) ---------- - sin(2 x) + 2 sin(x)
3
(%i16) b(0) + b(1)*sin(x) + b(2)*sin(2*x) + b(3)*sin(3*x)+b(4)*sin(4*x); sin(4 x) 2 sin(3 x)
(%o16) - -------- + ---------- - sin(2 x) + 2 sin(x)
2 3
(%i17) b(0) + b(1)*sin(x) + b(2)*sin(2*x) + b(3)*sin(3*x)+b(4)*sin(4*x)+b(5)*sin(5*x);
2 sin(5 x) sin(4 x) 2 sin(3 x)
(%o17) ---------- - -------- + ---------- - sin(2 x) + 2 sin(x)
```

`(%i22) plot2d ([%o12,%o13,%o14,%o15,%o16,%o17,f], [x, -%pi, %pi],[box, false])$`

I remember that M has an Animate command that could produce a cooler animation

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

Hi;

I did not say that they were polynomials, they just look like them.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

Why is this not a polynomial?

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

A polynomial is an expression made up of integer powers of x.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

Non-negative inteher

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

Yes, that is correct.

Tomorrow we will try another.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

It should have been integer rather than inteher.

Tomorrow with respect to whom?

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

For you of course.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

OK, it is now tomorrow with respect to me

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

Yes, I need some time to prepare another example. Also, I am making dinner.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

Will you feed me tonight?

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,748

Of course, ever had pizza?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

Of course, do you know what a gel candle is?

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**