Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #76 2013-11-21 20:34:43

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

You mean to modify fluxbb itself?

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

## #77 2013-11-21 20:39:53

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

I would think so. The real administrator has access to the code itself while I do not. I could do it manually but it would take a long time.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #78 2013-11-21 20:45:47

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Okay, yeah, doing it manually would be silly.
Maybe we can grep the posts having question marks, or words like 'find', 'prove' etc.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

## #79 2013-11-21 21:04:22

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

I could try adding a codeword like you suggest, then the search could find them easily. One idea is to search for "A)", that might find most of them.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #80 2013-11-21 21:26:19

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Okay, that's fine.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

## #81 2013-11-21 21:45:02

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

The A) is not working for me but *New Problem* in the search has found lots of them! Make sure you set it up as phrontister advised.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #82 2013-11-21 21:56:10

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

If we follow a convention, searching would be easy.
I can't see phrontister here?

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

## #83 2013-11-21 22:15:04

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

He specified how to set up the search:

Keyword search *New problem*

Author search bobbym

In Forum  all forums

In Search In message text only

Sort by Subject

Sort Order Descending

Show Results as Posts

You know the name of the threads that contain problems.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #84 2013-11-21 22:16:49

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Why not sort by date?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #85 2013-11-21 22:18:41

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

In which field?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #86 2013-11-21 22:20:50

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Sort by.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #87 2013-11-21 22:22:34

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Does that do better? I think Subject is at least as good.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #88 2013-11-22 05:52:12

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Certain problems are easier when solved after a problem posted a bit before it.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #89 2013-11-22 06:06:10

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Okay, he can search that way too. Some of the earlier ones still might not be found though.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #90 2013-11-25 01:44:34

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

New Problem:

Player A has 'm' coins more than Player B (who has 'n' coins). Assuming coins to be fair, what's the probability that A gets more number of heads than B on tossing all the coins?

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

## #91 2013-11-25 15:03:27

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Hi gAr;

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #92 2013-11-25 17:16:06

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Hi bobbym,

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

## #93 2013-11-25 17:22:41

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Hi gAr;

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #94 2013-11-25 17:41:53

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Hi bobbym,

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

## #95 2013-11-25 17:52:26

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Hi gAr;

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #96 2013-11-25 18:07:15

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

## #97 2013-11-25 18:12:23

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Where does the problem come from?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #98 2013-11-25 18:19:50

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

From Nick's, the question was for m=1.
I changed it to  'm coins more than' .
I checked the later edition of Epstein's book, but could not find the problem in it.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

## #99 2013-11-25 18:23:08

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Hi;

M can not simplify that in terms of elementary functions so I doubt there is a closed form for it. Do you need one? Why are the sums not good enough?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #100 2013-11-25 18:39:33

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Probability problem.

Even the guessing routines in some packages failed, so there might not be one.
I did not say sums are not good enough.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."