Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #1 2013-10-13 02:32:44

Al-Allo
Full Member

Offline

### Question on associativity.

Hey, I just have a question concerning associativity :

I have :

by associativity

And I needed to prove each of my steps concerning an exercise. What I found weird was in the correction part, they justify the retreat of parentheses by saying "associativty" I thought that associativity was only used when you needed to add parentheses, or it can go in both ways ? Could anyone confirm it ???

## #2 2013-10-13 03:03:56

Nehushtan
Power Member

Online

### Re: Question on associativity.

You need parentheses on the RHS. You probably mean

i.e. sum the RHS terms from left to right.

## #3 2013-10-13 03:14:56

Al-Allo
Full Member

Offline

### Re: Question on associativity.

No, it is exactly the way I've put it in my first post ^^

## #4 2013-10-13 18:11:27

bob bundy
Moderator

Offline

### Re: Question on associativity.

hi Al-Allo

The rule for associativity is:

Nehushtan is absolutely right;  associativity applies to binary operations; that is to say, two elements combined to make one; so a four element expression doesn't exist.

I assume that the questioner intends the four element expression means 'add' elements in pairs in order going left to right hence

combine a + b, then the result with c; then that result with d.  This is what Nehushtan has written.

So how do you do it?

treat (a + b) as P; c as Q; d as R

Bob

You cannot teach a man anything;  you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei