Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #2401 20131009 00:33:34
Re: What do you think?Hi bobbym, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #2402 20131009 03:09:43
Re: What do you think?Hi; gar and anonimnystefy; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2403 20131009 05:31:10
Re: What do you think?Hello: Last edited by ElainaVW (20131009 05:34:34) #2404 20131009 05:36:43
Re: What do you think?Hi EVW; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2405 20131009 05:45:24
Re: What do you think?
Bring it on! The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2406 20131009 20:21:16
Re: What do you think?New problem: In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2407 20131010 07:33:40
Re: What do you think?Hi bobbym Last edited by anonimnystefy (20131010 07:42:30) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2408 20131010 08:15:06
Re: What do you think?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2409 20131010 08:18:10
Re: What do you think?Hi bobbym The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2410 20131010 08:20:00
Re: What do you think?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2411 20131010 08:22:06
Re: What do you think?I will try to post mine as soon as I can. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2412 20131010 08:24:30
Re: What do you think?That would be appreciated. I am half way through some geogebra code too. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2413 20131010 09:01:02
Re: What do you think?Code:pt[k_] := {x, y} /. NSolve[{3 (x  2)^2 + 4 (y  2)^2 == 11 && y  2 == Tan[k] (x  2)}, {x, y}][[RandomInteger[] + 1]]; sides[pt1_, pt2_, pt3_] := (EuclideanDistance @@ #) & /@ {{pt1, pt2}, {pt1, pt3}, {pt2, pt3}}; area[a_, b_, c_] := 1/4 Sqrt[(a + b + c) (a + b + c) (a  b + c) (a + b  c)]; Table[area @@ (sides @@ (pt /@ RandomVariate[UniformDistribution[{0, 2 Pi}], 3])), {100000}] // Mean The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2414 20131010 09:03:09
Re: What do you think?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2415 20131010 09:16:11
Re: What do you think?No problem. Tell me if you see a way to improve it (and there surely is). The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2416 20131010 10:24:31
Re: What do you think?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2417 20131010 15:57:42
Re: What do you think?Hi, Last edited by gAr (20131010 16:06:51) "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #2418 20131010 19:17:19
Re: What do you think?Hi gAr; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2419 20131010 20:08:44
Re: What do you think?Hi bobbym, Last edited by gAr (20131010 20:12:12) "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #2420 20131010 20:12:52
Re: What do you think?Hi gAr; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2421 20131010 20:19:28
Re: What do you think?Hi, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #2422 20131010 20:25:21
Re: What do you think?Hi gAr; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2423 20131010 20:43:10
Re: What do you think?Hi, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #2424 20131010 20:47:55
Re: What do you think?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2425 20131010 22:12:39
Re: What do you think?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." 