I have several peole who are using their credit cards each month. The current limit on the credit card is $1500. What they are actually spending is anywhere from $220 to $890. I want to see how the actual card spend is distributed because if for example I see 50% of people spending on average $300 then I may recommend they use a card with a lower limit. If I see there is also another high percentage of people using the card alot (approx $700) then I may put those people on a higher limit credit card. Is a distribution chart something that could help me with that? If so, how would I arrange my data to be able to plot it?
Thanks in advance for any guidance!
Welcome to the forum. It would help to see typical data. You can make it up as long as it has the same flavor as the real data you have.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.
Welcome to the forum.
I see from your title that you suspect a normal distribution. In life data rarely conforms exactly to a convenient mathematical distribution; and your first job will have to be to find out what your data 'looks like' when graphed. My graphs below show what might happen.
You need to collect lots of actual spend values. These are your x values.
Group them and count how many in each group. Those frequencies are your y values. It's best to make each group the same width along the x axis eg 0-20; 20-40; 40-60 ..... rather than 0-20; 20-30; 30-35 ......
You'll also have to decide which group to put a value of exactly 20 in. Does it go in 0-20 or 20-40. In practice it shouldn't matter much as long as you only count it once. If you use the cents as well as the $ that should push nearly all borderline cases into the higher group, so you might as well make that the rule. The proper mathematical way to describe this is:
The more data you collect, the better your model will be but, obviously, at some stage you have to say "Right, I think I've got enough evidence; now I'll try the graph."
Once you have a graph post it back here to for an opinion about the resulting distribution. There are limits on image posting for Novices so you may have to post the data instead. Or tell us a link to find it.
If the data does conform approximately to a 'Normal' then there is lots of analysis that can be done, but this won't be valid until we know the distribution. So start collecting data
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei