You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 125

In a Diagram shown in figure, Not that the Grid path from **F** to **G** is missing.

So path from **A** to **B** can not pass from **F** and **G**.

How many path are there from **A** to **B**

assume all path only have steps going up or to the right.

*Last edited by jacks (2013-09-29 05:30:44)*

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,734

Where is D and E?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 125

Sorry Bobbym , actually it is **A** and **B**

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,734

Hi;

I am getting 38 ways.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 125

Would you like to explain it to me, Thanks

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,734

For ones that have missing intersections and are small the vertex counting method will work fine.

The drawing shows the number of paths to each node.

Each node is the sum of the two nodes underneath and to left of it.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 125

Thanks Bobbym Got it.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,734

There is an analytical answer for these type but the counting method is easier to understand.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 125

Would you like to explain me analytical answer.

I also tried for that method but could not get it.

(But I like yours Counting method.)

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,734

Hi;

By combinatorics:

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 125

Thanks Bobbym would you like to explain me to it.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,734

It is just adding up all the paths in the lattice around the missing intersection.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: Harlan's World
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 16,015

Hi

is also a way.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 125

To anonimnystefy I have understand

(Which is Total no. of path from **A** to **B**, If There is a connectivity between F to G)

but Did not understand

Would you explain it to me.

Thanks

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: Harlan's World
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 16,015

It's the number of paths from A to F times the number of paths from G to B.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 125

To Admin (Bobbym) i did not understand it

It is just adding up all the paths in the lattice around the missing intersection.

Thanks

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: Harlan's World
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 16,015

I think I know which points he took, but I cannot be sure.

I think he used (2,3), (3,0) and (3,1), A being (0,0) and B being (5,4).

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,734

Hi;

Look at my drawing in post #6.

I picked (2,3), (3,1) and (4,0) and calculated the paths from there.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 125

It's the number of paths from A to F times the number of paths from G to B.

To anonimnystefy I did not understand it

why we minus it.

please explain it to me

Thanks

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: Harlan's World
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 16,015

anonimnystefy wrote:

It's the number of paths from A to F times the number of paths from G to B.

This is the reason. These are all the paths that become unavailable when we remove the line.

Hi bobbym

Yes, I meant (4,0).

*Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-09-30 07:59:54)*

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,734

Hi;

I did not see your post 17, I was answering his question.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: Harlan's World
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 16,015

Even better then.

I guess the question is fully answered now. Three ways is enough.

I just want to try to do one more thing.

*Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-09-30 08:04:30)*

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,734

There is another more general way. That maybe can answer for many missing intersections.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 125

Thanks Admin and anonimnystefy got it

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,734

Hi;

You are wlecome.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline