Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #826 20130720 19:12:51#827 20130722 12:36:32#828 20130722 12:56:48
Re: Hangman 1Is there an S? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #829 20130810 13:12:59#830 20130810 13:46:00
#831 20130810 21:05:28
Re: Hangman 1How about an I? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #832 20130810 23:47:58#833 20130811 00:03:46
Re: Hangman 1An n in there somewhere? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #834 20130813 11:33:04#835 20130813 14:07:53
Re: Hangman 1How about an M? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #836 20130915 02:23:12#837 20130915 02:26:57
Re: Hangman 1h. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #838 20130915 04:40:44
Re: Hangman 1How about an R? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #839 20130929 00:16:54#840 20130929 01:19:23
Re: Hangman 1Looks like an S goes in there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #841 20130930 00:02:29#842 20130930 00:29:21
Re: Hangman 1How about a T? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #843 20130930 02:10:22#844 20130930 02:19:23
Re: Hangman 1How about an E? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #845 20131112 23:21:29#846 20131112 23:24:26
Re: Hangman 1How about a big R? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #847 20131117 10:32:04#848 20131201 07:24:11#849 20131201 11:41:09
Re: Hangman 1How about an E? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #850 20140215 00:31:46 