Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #26 20130912 03:19:13
Re: Math ReviewHow much do they overlap? Look at the little circle that is what they overlap. So minus the barn we get 3 / 4 (10^2) π In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #27 20130912 03:42:26
Re: Math Reviewhi You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #28 20130912 07:01:55
Re: Math ReviewTo me it looks as if each side is over lapping by 3 blocks, each side overlapping by a green and two reds. Would that mean they are overlapping by 30? (3 blocks, each block = 10, 3 x 10 = 30) Last edited by demha (20130912 07:03:47) "The thing about quotes on the Internet is you cannot confirm their validity" ~Abraham Lincoln #29 20130912 09:21:08
Re: Math ReviewThe green circle is the overlap of the two circles because going right or left you have the same center. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #30 20130912 09:35:17
Re: Math ReviewYes I understand that. The Ecircle represents the entire range, the Fcircle and Gcircle represent the both ways the goat can go, and the Hcircle (green) represents where they overlap. So would this just be considered as one area, as in just 10? Making the equation: "The thing about quotes on the Internet is you cannot confirm their validity" ~Abraham Lincoln #31 20130912 09:37:24
Re: Math ReviewNo, remember you can not use the barn, so it is 3 / 4 of the circle. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #33 20130912 21:58:02
Re: Math ReviewHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #34 20130912 22:28:00
Re: Math ReviewCool! So it would be: "The thing about quotes on the Internet is you cannot confirm their validity" ~Abraham Lincoln #35 20130912 22:34:04
Re: Math ReviewHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #36 20130913 00:52:47
Re: Math ReviewOk, so redoing #7  #9: "The thing about quotes on the Internet is you cannot confirm their validity" ~Abraham Lincoln #37 20130913 02:01:51
Re: Math ReviewWhat do you want to do about 10, as you can see the expression is very complicated. Bob suggests you might submit an approximation. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #38 20130913 03:13:38
Re: Math ReviewOk here is the "redo" for #7  #10: "The thing about quotes on the Internet is you cannot confirm their validity" ~Abraham Lincoln #39 20130913 03:20:21
Re: Math ReviewThat is very close to the exact answer of 7213.3. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #41 20130913 05:44:32
Re: Math ReviewHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 