
Geometry.
Show that if a geometric figure is congruent to another geometric figure, which is in its turn congruent to a third geomtric figure, then the first geometric figure is congruent to the third.
We have the 3 geometric figures : A,B,C With the information given: A congruent to B, B congruent to C
So, inversely, we will have :
B congruent to A, because A is congruent to B, so, its inverse must necessarely also be true, because if it wasn't we would a contradiction with the information given to us that A congruent B, but we know that it isn't the case, so the only option left is B is really congruent to A
C congruent to B For the same reason has the above statement.
So, we have 3 geomtric figures congruent, because A is congruent to B, and having proved the inverse of B congruent C, that is, C congruent to B, we see that the two geometric figures(A and C) are also congruent to the same figure (B), and that...
A is congruent to C
Last edited by AlAllo (20130824 09:49:14)
 bob bundy
 Moderator
Re: Geometry.
hi AlAllo
This seems to be a good way to prove this, but your proof is difficult for me to follow because I'm not clear which lines are in which shape.
Bob
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Re: Geometry.
We have the 3 geometric figures : A,B,C With the information given: A congruent to B, B congruent to C
So, inversely, we will have :
B congruent to A, because A is congruent to B, so, its inverse must necessarely also be true, because if it wasn't we would a contradiction with the information given to us that A congruent B, but we know that it isn't the case, so the only option left is B is really congruent to A
C congruent to B For the same reason has the above statement.
So, we have 3 geomtric figures congruent, because A is congruent to B, and having proved the inverse of B congruent C, that is, C congruent to B, we see that the two geometric figures are also congruent to the same figure (B), and that...
A is congruent to C
Last edited by AlAllo (20130824 09:46:49)
Re: Geometry.
What does equal mean in terms of geometric figures?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
Re: Geometry.
anonimnystefy wrote:What does equal mean in terms of geometric figures?
Well, sorry for my mistake in terms, I meant congruent,xD
Re: Geometry.
Ok, here's another version :
We have the 3 geometric figures : A,B,C With the information given: A congruent to B, B congruent to C
So, inversely, we will have :
B congruent to A, because A is congruent to B, so, its inverse must necessarely also be true, because if it wasn't we would a contradiction with the information given to us that A congruent B, but we know that it isn't the case, so the only option left is B is really congruent to A
C congruent to B For the same reason has the above statement.
So, we have 3 geomtric figures congruent, because A is congruent to B, and having proved the inverse of B congruent C, that is, C congruent to B, we see that the two geometric figures(A and C) are also congruent to the same figure (B), and that...
A is congruent to C
Last edited by AlAllo (20130824 09:49:34)
Re: Geometry.
So, A is congruent to C because A and C are both congruent to B? Isn't that what you need to prove in the first place?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
Re: Geometry.
anonimnystefy wrote:So, A is congruent to C because A and C are both congruent to B? Isn't that what you need to prove in the first place?
Well, isn't it self evident?
Anyway, I think I should yes ^^
