Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

Pages: **1**

**bill.stead****Member**- Registered: 2013-08-10
- Posts: 10

Hi everyone. As i said in my intro I am a welder. I've been asked to construct a spiral made up of triangles. Like most jobs I have sat down to draw it out and make cutting lists etc so I can give the customer a fair estimate of cost.

After doing the old A2+B2=C2 a few times to work out the lengths of the sides I notices I no longer need to do that. The answer for the next triangle is always in the previous one.

E.G If the next A or B is the previous c, then the next c is the previous a+b.(to my level of accuracy anyway lol)

This got me thinking,how would I describe this change of value in math 'talk'.

I'm more interested in the way it would be described than the lvl of accuracy.

I know this is probably a simple question and apologies if I offend anyone.

Thank you all in advance for your patience.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,547

E.G If the next A or B is the previous c, then the next c is the previous a+b.

Is a and A the same? Is b and B the same?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**bill.stead****Member**- Registered: 2013-08-10
- Posts: 10

yes, sorry, my mistake.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,547

If A + B = C

what about D, is it B + C?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**bill.stead****Member**- Registered: 2013-08-10
- Posts: 10

To clarify, I know the statement

" If the next A or B is the previous C, then the next C is the previous A+B"

is probably not very accurate. I guess I'm trying to find out how this would be wrote as a formula that describes how the value of A,B and C change. I know its probably childishly simple to most of you. I would be eternally grateful if someone would point me in the right direction and I'll try and learn more.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,547

Hi;

Try to describe the process without resorting to any math. There is a rule that if you can not state it in words you do not understand the problem well enough to solve regardless of how much math you know.

Think about the process itself and then describe it as if you were talking to your Grandmother. Take your time.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**bill.stead****Member**- Registered: 2013-08-10
- Posts: 10

bobbym wrote:

If A + B = C

what about D, is it B + C?

A quick look around suggests I need to be looking into recursive,would that be right? thanks for your help, much appreciated

*Last edited by bill.stead (2013-08-10 04:52:41)*

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,547

That is where I was trying to take you.

But I still think before you look at any math you should be able to state the problem, in your own language. It may be a simple recursion a[n]=a[n-1]+a[n-2] or it may be something else.

If you can not clearly state the problem then post the measurements.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**bill.stead****Member**- Registered: 2013-08-10
- Posts: 10

ok, if we start with an equal triangle number 1 with short sides 2m. Then the long side is 2.8m. That then becomes one of triangle number 2's short sides.so triangle number 2s long side is 4m. that then becomes a side for triangle number 3, etc etc.that creates a spiral made of triangles that increase in size in relation to the previous triangle. (I've rounded the math up a bit).

using what you put above, the closest I can get right now is (using a,b,and c )

c[n]=c[n-a+b]

but that only looks to be part of it.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,547

Hi;

2's short sides.so triangle number 2s long side is 4m.

How does that happen?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 6,311

So you have

T1 2, 2, 2√ 2

T2 2√ 2, 2√ 2, 4

T3 4, 4, 4√ 4

etc

??

Bob

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,547

That is what I mean T3 is impossible.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 6,311

These triangles are spiralling upwards. Does that help?

Bob

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,547

How can the sides violate the triangle inequality?

When he mentions the sides I assume he means the sides of the triangle.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 6,311

Sorry. My mistake. When I'm 'on the case', my maths jumps ahead so fast, my arithmetic cannot keep up. You will have seen me do this sort of thing many times. What I meant was

T3 4, 4, 4√2

Bob

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**bill.stead****Member**- Registered: 2013-08-10
- Posts: 10

Would it help if I put up a quick drawing to explain what prompted the question?

I have to admit I'm not sure the real world application would stand up to a detailed formula.

The idea was to be able to work out the total design with nothing more than one measurement and a formula.However I was more interested in how such a formula would be expressed rather than if it would work. I could only get it to work by rounding everything to 2 decimal places.I'm not even sure if it would work at larger scale.

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 6,311

Drawing would be good.

B

Offline

**bill.stead****Member**- Registered: 2013-08-10
- Posts: 10

This is the drawing for half of a window frame to be welded up.

Offline

**bill.stead****Member**- Registered: 2013-08-10
- Posts: 10

As you can see from the above drawing, each triangle is extrapolated from the one below.

All measurements in cm.

if you were given the first measurement, eg 15 cm, how would you express a formula to calculate the rest.

Yes I know if I did not round it all to 2 decimal place it would not work. The point is I don't need .o1 of a cm accuracy to build this in the real world. Can this sort of 'error' be built into a math formula?

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 6,311

OK thanks.

So here's the recursive formula:

Bob

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 6,311

so

I would work accurately for all steps and round off as appropriate. Otherwise the rounding errors will accumulate.

Bob

Offline

**bill.stead****Member**- Registered: 2013-08-10
- Posts: 10

Thank you both very much for your patience . I can see I have a long road ahead of me to understand all of that. At least I know what to look for now.

Offline

Pages: **1**