Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #26 20130805 05:10:35
Re: Number splittingFor VI) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #27 20130805 05:25:19
Re: Number splittingHi meanmaths Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130805 05:26:34) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #28 20130806 09:58:43
Re: Number splittingCongrats bobbym for the splittings. Only one left. Number Splitter #1 GameMaster of Mean Sumurai @ Google Play #29 20130806 09:59:59
Re: Number splittinganonimnystefy, Number Splitter #1 GameMaster of Mean Sumurai @ Google Play #30 20130806 12:07:32
Re: Number splittingHi Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130806 17:53:05) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #31 20130806 20:51:14
Re: Number splittingUse this for a recurrence.
last solution for VI) ( 71+13+3+8+4+3 ) / 6 = 17 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #32 20130807 22:44:02
Re: Number splittingHi meanmaths It does look much nicer than before and it agrees with bobbym's recursion. Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130807 23:01:08) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #33 20130808 12:10:50
Re: Number splittingTerrific. Number Splitter #1 GameMaster of Mean Sumurai @ Google Play #34 20130808 19:06:57
Re: Number splittingHi;
He is gifted, I am a bumpkin . In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #35 20130808 19:52:24
Re: Number splittingBobbym's gifted as much as he denies it. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #36 20130808 23:06:35
Re: Number splittingHi EDIT: Found a formula for V b): Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130808 23:45:22) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #37 20130809 04:34:00
Re: Number splittingHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #38 20130809 06:45:22
Re: Number splittingI wonder if a general formula is achievable for k unused numbers. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #39 20130809 07:55:39
Re: Number splittingA quick post to present the (probably) last parts. Last edited by meanmaths (20130809 07:57:30) Number Splitter #1 GameMaster of Mean Sumurai @ Google Play #40 20130809 09:38:48
Re: Number splittingHi The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #41 20130809 09:54:05
Re: Number splitting8 + [99] + 5 + 3 + 83 = 99 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #42 20130809 09:56:40
Re: Number splittingFormula: Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130809 11:11:24) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #43 20130809 11:03:42
Re: Number splittingHi anonimnystefy; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #44 20130809 11:12:30
Re: Number splittingI have edited my post. Apparently F[n1]+F[n]=F[n+2], according to me. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #45 20130809 11:49:31
Re: Number splittingHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #46 20130809 12:31:07
Re: Number splittingGood, we are talking about the same post. Have you seen the edited version of it? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #47 20130809 12:37:44
Re: Number splittingEdited? Looks the same. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #48 20130809 12:42:11
Re: Number splittingNope. The index of F changed. It was n+2 before. Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130809 12:42:57) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #49 20130809 12:47:58
Re: Number splittingOkay, it is working fine now. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #50 20130809 12:49:32
Re: Number splittingGreat then. Still need to get the second part. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment 