Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫  π  -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #101 2013-07-23 02:08:45

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

27^n+2 - 6*3^3n+3/3^n9^n+2
That is it.

Thanks.

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #102 2013-07-23 06:39:13

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

Okay, so far I have this,where is the mistake?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #103 2013-07-23 06:52:16

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

That's perfect no mistake!

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #104 2013-07-23 06:56:41

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

How about doing some factoring there?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #105 2013-07-23 07:03:21

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

It says we should simplify it. But I don't know if it could be factorized. I tried doing it but the six has given me a tough time, it cannot be reduced to have  3 in order to have the same base as the others.

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #106 2013-07-23 07:08:07

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

How about simplifying 27^{3n+3} to start?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #107 2013-07-23 07:15:46

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

Okay,
= 3^3(n+2) = 3^(3n+6). You changed the exponent, please look at the original one above.

Last edited by EbenezerSon (2013-07-23 07:19:10)

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #108 2013-07-23 07:21:30

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

I was thinking of

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #109 2013-07-23 07:26:04

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

At the back of the book the answer given was 21.

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #110 2013-07-23 07:31:13

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

That is incorrect. If post #102 is correct the answer I am getting is 7. Please look closely at post #102 and make sure I have the right problem as you see it in your text book.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #111 2013-07-23 07:37:50

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

Yes, they are the ones in the book, the book could be wrong so please let proceed.
I have instances,  I had my calculations correct while it had it wrong.

I will post a question I know I am correct while it has it wrong.

Last edited by EbenezerSon (2013-07-23 07:59:38)

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #112 2013-07-23 07:52:58

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

Hi;

Answer is 7.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #113 2013-07-23 08:12:56

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

But I don't seem to understand those methods

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #114 2013-07-23 08:22:20

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

Hi;

They are based on the laws of exponents. As far as I can see that is a tedious problem. There maybe something simpler but I can not see it.

What step is a problem?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #115 2013-07-23 08:35:29

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

This problem is from indices. So I had thought  all the bases would be equal so I can take them off and simplify the exponent.
So I multiplied the six and the three which is eighteen and cannot be reduced to three, so that all the bases would be equall(to be three).

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #116 2013-07-23 08:40:22

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

You mean multiple 6 * 3^(3n+3) ?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #117 2013-07-23 08:42:58

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

Yes to be > 18^(3n+3). But I see the eighteen cannot further be reduced to three, in order to have the same base with the others.

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #118 2013-07-23 08:45:54

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

That is incorrect. You can not say

6 * 3^(3n+3) = 18^(3n+3).

You can always test an idea by substituting some numbers for the variable. Try n = 1 and use a calculator.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #119 2013-07-23 08:48:29

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

Because so far all the problems I solved have the same bases, which is easy for me to take them off and simplify the exponent.

So I thought I could apply that on this problem.

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #120 2013-07-23 08:53:35

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

That is why I turned them all into the same bases, that way you can cancel and multiply when needed.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #121 2013-07-23 08:56:10

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

Then I need to learn the laws of exponents, or do indices also teaches that? If not then please could you assist me learn it?

Thanks for your assistance, God bless!

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #122 2013-07-23 09:15:25

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

Yes, we can over the laws of exponents. Try here first.

Please look at these pages, they will help a lot.

http://www.mathsisfun.com/exponent.html

http://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/varia … tiply.html

http://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/exponent-laws.html

Do not worry if you can not absorb it all. It will come in time. Ask questions about anything you do not understand.

I am going to take a little break to do some chores be back later. Please look over those pages in the meantime.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #123 2013-07-23 23:08:47

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

A^n = A*A*A*.....A*

I think it should be impossible in that regard, because it has raised to the n. Meaning n is dividing the A, like n/A.

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## #124 2013-07-23 23:24:34

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

### Re: Simplify the following:

A^n means A * A * A ... n times.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

## #125 2013-07-23 23:26:58

EbenezerSon
Member
Registered: 2013-07-04
Posts: 551

### Re: Simplify the following:

I have learnt that 5^0 = 1. Can you explain to me why it is equal to one?

I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing

Offline

## Board footer

Powered by FluxBB