Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

Pages: **1**

**cooljackiec****Member**- Registered: 2012-12-13
- Posts: 185

In the adjoining figure, AB is tangent at A to the circle with center O , point D is interior to the circle, and DB intersects the circle at C. If BC = DC = 3,OD = 2 , and AB = 6, then find the radius of the circle.

I see you have graph paper.

You must be plotting something

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,737

Hi cooljackiec;

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.** **A number by itself is useful, but it is far more useful to know how accurate or certain that number is.**

Offline

**cooljackiec****Member**- Registered: 2012-12-13
- Posts: 185

thanks. can you help me on this?

I see you have graph paper.

You must be plotting something

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 7,613

hi

There's a theorem that is true for all circles. For any four points on the circumference, see diagram

AE x EC = DE x EB

That should be enough for you to do this one.

Bob

ps. to prove it look for equal angles using the circle theorems and then similar triangles.

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**cooljackiec****Member**- Registered: 2012-12-13
- Posts: 185

hmm.. that is the power of a point theorem right?? i think it works for secants/tagents too

I see you have graph paper.

You must be plotting something

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 7,613

I've not met it called that, but Wiki agrees with you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_of_a_point

And yes it does apply to tangents.

Bob

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**cooljackiec****Member**- Registered: 2012-12-13
- Posts: 185

still stuck

I see you have graph paper.

You must be plotting something

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,737

Hi;

I got an answer of 31 by another method. Can you check it?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.** **A number by itself is useful, but it is far more useful to know how accurate or certain that number is.**

Offline

**cooljackiec****Member**- Registered: 2012-12-13
- Posts: 185

seems correct. how did you do that?

I see you have graph paper.

You must be plotting something

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,737

I have been experimenting with the team of bobbym and geogebra, trying to be more than an amazed bystander. The great gAr would describe it as a "mathod!"

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.** **A number by itself is useful, but it is far more useful to know how accurate or certain that number is.**

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 7,613

hi cooljackiec

still stuck

I'm assuming you mean with the question in post 3.

I put x = XP and y = QY.

Then applied the theorem twice:

5 x 6 = x(27+y)

7 x 12 = (x+27)y

I subtracted to eliminate xy.

Then made y the subject of that and substituted back into one equation to make a quadratic.

It factorised easily with one positive and one negative root. Rejected the negative and then substituted back to find y.

Got the same answer as bobbym.

Bob

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**grace_rong****Member**- Registered: 2016-08-12
- Posts: 2

Hi bobbym,

Do you mind telling me how you solved the first problem?

Thanks,

Grace

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,737

Hi grace_rong;

Welcome to the forum. That was done more than 3 years ago. See post #10.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**thickhead****Member**- Registered: 2016-04-16
- Posts: 700

*Last edited by thickhead (2016-08-12 19:04:27)*

**SOMETHING IS BETTER THAN NOTHING."NOTHING" IS BETTER THAN "NONSENSE".NOTHING IS BETTER THAN NONSENSE. **

**Online**

**grace_rong****Member**- Registered: 2016-08-12
- Posts: 2

Thanks thickhead and bobbym!

Offline

Pages: **1**