Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #151 20130622 06:31:23
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsI think it has not to do with interpolation. See in #146 post Last edited by Herc11 (20130622 06:34:00) #152 20130622 06:33:49
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsUnless you eliminate the a0, a1 and a2 you will have more than 6 variables. You will have 9 variables. This means 9 cubics. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #153 20130622 06:35:38
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsWhy to eliminate? Last edited by Herc11 (20130622 06:43:29) #154 20130622 06:42:27
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsAren't the a0, a1, a2, a3 the coefficients of the cubic? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #155 20130622 06:46:48
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsYes they are coeffients. #156 20130622 06:55:20
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #157 20130622 06:58:53#158 20130622 07:07:35
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #159 20130622 07:10:19#160 20130622 07:23:52
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsHe is sleeping by now, I think. I need some rest. see you later and thanks for the problems. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #161 20130622 07:29:11#162 20130622 07:31:24#163 20130622 08:31:46
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsHi guys The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #164 20130622 15:28:09
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsHi anonimnystefy, #165 20130622 17:23:05
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #166 20130622 17:27:18#167 20130622 17:37:05
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #168 20130622 17:41:05#169 20130622 17:49:46
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsNumerical difficulties. Although A,B and C in my problem are integers the equations have enough instability in them to run off to the complex plane. Already Geogebra cannot create the points accurately enough and it has 16 digits of precision. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #170 20130622 17:52:49#171 20130622 17:57:20
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsYou mean a set consisting of {1,2,3,4,...p} where p is primes? If so, that is what I did. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #172 20130622 18:00:09
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsSomething like that... Last edited by Herc11 (20130622 18:06:32) #173 20130622 18:08:15
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsYes, I know my grasp of theory is horrendous. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #174 20130622 18:16:22#175 20130622 18:33:52
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsA small thing to improve performance of solving that would be to have the coefficient of the constant term rather than the leading coefficient. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 