Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #51 20130427 10:15:16
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.apatnapu't anim In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #52 20130427 13:47:15
#53 20130427 14:01:08
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.apatnapu't walo In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #54 20130428 16:56:40
#55 20130428 19:08:41
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.limampu ? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #56 20130428 22:05:23
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.Limampu't isa 246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1) #57 20130428 22:29:41
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.No, I just use desktops. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #58 20130429 09:51:10
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.I just discovered it. 246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1) #59 20130430 04:50:12
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.Limampu't apat In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #60 20130502 12:47:22
#61 20130502 19:53:31
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.limampu't anim In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #62 20130502 19:56:18
#63 20130502 20:05:02
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.limampu't walo In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #64 20130502 20:13:20
#65 20130502 20:17:54
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.animnapu't In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #66 20130503 09:53:24
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.
No 't when multiples of ten. 246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1) #67 20130503 10:30:03
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.Is it animnapu? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #68 20130503 10:48:18
#69 20130503 10:53:45
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.animnapu't apat In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #70 20130503 11:17:50
#71 20130503 11:18:32
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.animnapu't anim In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #72 20130503 19:43:06
#73 20130503 19:43:58
Re: Let's make Filipino numbers.animnapu't walo In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #74 20130504 09:42:25
