Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #101 20130418 03:08:45
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Can you please compute asymptotic_a[n]a[n] for a few n and post it here? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #102 20130418 03:14:44
Re: Julianthemath's number 3
I do not understand that. What is a[n]a[n]? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #103 20130418 03:17:23
Re: Julianthemath's number 3The first one is asymptotic_a[n], not just a[n]. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #104 20130418 03:20:43
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Isn't that what the those fractions are in post #98 and 100? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #105 20130418 03:22:39
Re: Julianthemath's number 3It is not. Or at least it is not supposed to be. That should be a[n]/asymptotic_a[n]. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #106 20130418 03:24:31
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Yes, you know what I mean. Okay, I will give the differences. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #107 20130418 03:27:48
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Hm, and what do you get for Floor[asymptotic_a[n]] for different n? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #108 20130418 03:32:25
Re: Julianthemath's number 3In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #109 20130418 03:39:53
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Aren't those the sequuence numbers? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #110 20130418 03:41:48
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Yes, they are. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #111 20130418 03:44:46
Re: Julianthemath's number 3So, we have found a simpler exact form? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #112 20130418 03:46:41
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Yes but with one problem. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #113 20130418 03:47:28
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Which? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #114 20130418 03:48:55
Re: Julianthemath's number 3The floor function is a stepwise function, it is more difficult to work with. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #115 20130418 03:51:26
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Yes, but at least it is a bit simpler. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #116 20130418 03:55:18
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Some analytical techniques have problems with anything other than a mathematicians dream like smooth functions. To use them you will have to split the recurrence into 4 of them. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #117 20130418 03:58:38
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Which analitycal techniques? Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130418 03:59:02) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #118 20130418 04:04:23
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Almost any of them also some M techniques too. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 