Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #1 20130415 16:19:43
Julianthemath's number 3This is my third version of the Julianthemath number (since Nehushtan got the rule of my sequence). S = Square SR = Square Root T = Triangular TR = Triangular root This is also called the : Squmintrius number (complex, right? ) Examples : 1. ( (1+4)(1+2) ) + ( (1+3)(1+2) ) ( 5  3 ) + ( 4  3 ) 2 + 1 3, a Squimintrius number 2. ( (4+9)(2+3) ) + ( (3+6)(2+3) ) ( 13  5 ) + ( 9  5 ) 8 + 4 12 3. ( (9+16)(3+4) ) + ( (6+10)(3+4) ) ( 25  7 ) + ( 16  7 ) 18 + 9 27 So, the Squimintrius sequence is : 3, 12, 27... So, what's the pattern here? Last edited by julianthemath (20130415 17:05:29) 246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1) #2 20130415 16:48:38
Re: Julianthemath's number 3That second number should be 12 not 11. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #3 20130415 17:04:34
#4 20130415 17:16:01
Re: Julianthemath's number 348 is the next number. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #5 20130415 17:18:42
#6 20130415 18:10:24
Re: Julianthemath's number 3How about this sequence: Mathematichs is the queen of sciences  C. F. Gauss #7 20130415 18:25:47
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Don't know. Maybe you should post it in "Berliner's number 1", or something 246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1) #8 20130415 18:30:47
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Thanks. By the way the formula was: Mathematichs is the queen of sciences  C. F. Gauss #9 20130415 19:23:36
#10 20130415 19:33:04
Re: Julianthemath's number 3It's one of my sequence Mathematichs is the queen of sciences  C. F. Gauss #11 20130416 04:27:23
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Continue this sequence and find the general form: The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #12 20130416 04:58:05
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Did you check the OEIS? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #13 20130416 05:16:28
Re: Julianthemath's number 3There are many possible answers that OEIS gives. But not all are the ones I am looking for. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #14 20130416 05:19:30
Re: Julianthemath's number 3It could be a new sequence. I would like very much to see a few more terms. Can you compute them? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #15 20130416 05:33:36
Re: Julianthemath's number 3I am sure it is not new. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #16 20130416 05:39:55
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Okay, thanks for the help. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #17 20130416 05:49:48
Re: Julianthemath's number 3This one: The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #18 20130416 05:55:30
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Hmmm, now you are talking. Let's have a few more of em and we are in business. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #19 20130416 06:21:32
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Do you want just the terms or the reccurence? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #20 20130416 06:23:50
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #21 20130416 06:40:48
Re: Julianthemath's number 3It is kinda unusual, though. Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130416 06:41:37) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #22 20130416 06:47:31
Re: Julianthemath's number 3The tensor operator does what here? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #23 20130416 06:50:53
Re: Julianthemath's number 3It represents the xor operation. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #24 20130416 06:56:17
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Okay, exclusive or. The next looks like a binary representation? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #25 20130416 07:54:09
Re: Julianthemath's number 3Yes, that is what it is. Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130416 07:57:54) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment 