Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #676 20130406 23:14:03#677 20130406 23:27:09
Re: Hangman 1Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #678 20130406 23:38:21#679 20130406 23:44:31
Re: Hangman 1Then I detect an O! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #680 20130407 10:01:35#681 20130408 10:35:58#682 20130408 10:53:22
Re: Hangman 1How about a U? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #683 20130410 09:43:18#684 20130411 12:57:59#685 20130411 16:08:03#686 20130411 18:06:04
Re: Hangman 1How about an I? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #687 20130413 23:00:26#688 20130413 23:17:46
Re: Hangman 1Is there a T? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #689 20130413 23:50:44#690 20130413 23:57:27
Re: Hangman 1How about an S? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #691 20130414 09:52:46#692 20130414 22:24:47#693 20130414 22:25:45
Re: Hangman 1Maybe an R? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #694 20130417 11:10:11#695 20130417 12:01:15#696 20130417 12:33:15#697 20130417 14:33:22
Re: Hangman 1A T please? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #698 20130420 22:37:41#699 20130421 01:43:31
Re: Hangman 1How about an N. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #700 20130421 13:49:19 