Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

#426 2013-04-01 13:11:23

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

The same answer I had originally by accident.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#427 2013-04-01 13:13:15

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Your code still isn't correct. Leaving from three is #[[3]]=1 not Last[#]3!


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#428 2013-04-01 13:22:05

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Yes I know, I am still cleaning it up in my notes and I cleaned the post.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#429 2013-04-01 13:27:32

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Ok. So, that answer is final? Then, we have to see how Agnishom did it.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#430 2013-04-01 13:28:11

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

I think his answer is way too high.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#431 2013-04-01 13:33:08

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

We'll have to see what he did.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#432 2013-04-01 13:34:22

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

35% is much too high just by inspection.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#433 2013-04-01 13:37:22

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

That is true. I wonder where his simulation went wrong.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#434 2013-04-01 13:43:10

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

A simulation is not enough, you have to interpret the results correctly. He probably did something like I did.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB