Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #1 2013-02-25 21:13:42

panicoschr
Member

Offline

### Standard Deviation

Hello. Can someone help me on this ?
Is it possible to calculate Standard Deviation for points distrubuted in 3-axis?
X Y Z.

Thanks

## #2 2013-02-25 21:20:24

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

Hi;

Welcome to the forum. You could get the standard deviation of the x's, then the y's and then the z's.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #3 2013-02-25 22:35:12

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

Standard deviation like a mean works on a list of elements not on 3 at a time.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #4 2013-03-22 01:35:29

panicoschr
Member

Offline

### Re: Standard Deviation

Hello again
i have another issue, if you could assist.
I have an array of integers from 0 - 250 positions, each one containing an integer. Is it possible to get a single value for this array, so that I can tell the difference between this array and other future arrays? Perhaps an integral?

## #5 2013-03-22 01:39:17

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

There are several ideas but I would need to know a little bit more.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #6 2013-03-22 02:10:16

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

Hi;

You are saying that you are using an array to keep track of 251 colors. You are assigning each box to a color and incrementing it by one each time you find one?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #7 2013-03-22 02:19:42

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

Okay, what are you trying to do with that? Do you have some other array to compare it to?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #8 2013-03-22 02:26:52

panicoschr
Member

Offline

### Re: Standard Deviation

it would be easy to compare it with another array, slot by slot. But i want to get a value out of each array. Thinking of the array as a graph-> can i get a value out of it? area perhaps?distance of the area from 0? perhaps 2 or 3 small areas on a graph separated by 0 color values? sorry i can not think anything to compare 2 graphs that may look completely different.

## #9 2013-03-22 02:35:11

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

You want to turn the array into a single number? This could very well take much more time than comparing them element by element.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #10 2013-03-22 02:37:17

panicoschr
Member

Offline

### Re: Standard Deviation

can i do this, turn it to a number?

## #11 2013-03-22 02:44:18

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

You are using some programming language?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #12 2013-03-22 02:46:22

panicoschr
Member

Offline

### Re: Standard Deviation

yes I am using C++ in eclipse.

## #13 2013-03-22 02:49:30

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

Does the new C++ have multiprecision arithmetic yet?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #14 2013-03-22 02:54:03

panicoschr
Member

Offline

### Re: Standard Deviation

I don't know what is this.
But i know it has fields like float and double.

Last edited by panicoschr (2013-03-22 02:54:25)

## #15 2013-03-22 02:56:06

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

It still only has 16 digits of precision is what I mean. Basically that means only 16 digits in any number.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #16 2013-03-22 03:14:59

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

No, not exactly. Remember order counts in your array so you just can't add up the numbers or multiply them. The simplest thing of course is the decimal system. How high are the numbers in the each array?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #17 2013-03-22 05:42:31

panicoschr
Member

Offline

### Re: Standard Deviation

sorry i had to leave for some time. I made a small testing , saw max no = 160. Of course most of the slots are value 0. Lets say only 30 slots have a value {3,4, 10 , 20 , 34 etc)

## #18 2013-03-22 09:40:17

bobbym

Online

### Re: Standard Deviation

Hmmm, that is going to be a problem.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.