Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**SteveB****Member**- Registered: 2013-03-07
- Posts: 557

Right. I kinow what you mean by that and you may well have put the right number at the top, but

it is a good idea to try to avoid putting something like " 9 x 9 = 1 " because although it is indeed 1

that we are trying to get here strictly speaking 9 x 9 is 81.

You can probably see that the answer at the top becomes: 0 8 3 1 so the answer is 831.

Shall we try a multiplication for a change how about 683 x 6 ?

First of all how should we lay out this multiplication ?

Offline

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

i have to nipm out to the shops so will send it later tonight around 7.00pm ok?

Offline

**SteveB****Member**- Registered: 2013-03-07
- Posts: 557

Okay. I have made a few notes on some multiplication for you to try they are:

683 x 6 ?

781 x 3 ?

687 x 7 ?

See you at 7pm, I might be a little late for that but not by much. Bye

Offline

**SteveB****Member**- Registered: 2013-03-07
- Posts: 557

Actually just to correct that last bit I am early. So ready when you are.

Offline

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

Hi steveb mandy here just a quick message to say iam sorry but have to go out so can't be on here. Tonight but will be inherent tomorrow at 2.00pm. Ok will do the times sums you lecture me ok? If you want to send me an email with some work to do you can ok?

Offline

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

Hi bob bundy mandy here just wondering how you think I am doing with my maths? Send me a message back please?

Offline

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

Hi mandy here dose anyone know anyone called bobmill or not if so let me know please? Like now please?

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,654

Yes, I know bob mill. Do you know him?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

**Online**

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

Now I didn't know him just wondered why him name came up on computer then? If he wants to take to me that is fine with me? Send message back now please?

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,654

He is gone and not likely to come back.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

**Online**

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

Ok bobbym thanks for that

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,654

Pardon me for asking but did he talk to you?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

**Online**

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

Nohe did not just the name came up on the computer ok? Why do you ask? Just wanted ok?

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,654

I wanted to know if he was bothering you.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

**Online**

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

Is he bad news then? If so if he comes on here again I will not talk to him ok? Send me message back now please?

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,654

He might sneak in. He is a spammer. Do not worry about him,.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

**Online**

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

Hi steveb mandy here i have done the sums you left me ok?

2 3

2 7

_____

1 5 1

4 6 0

_____

6 1 1

_____

3 6

3 4

______

1 4 4

1 0 8 0

______

1 2 2 4

______

1 6 7

2 5 4

______

6 6 8

8 3 5 0

3 3 4 0 0

_________

4 2 4 1 8

________

Sorry I. Took so long are these right?

Offline

**SteveB****Member**- Registered: 2013-03-07
- Posts: 557

mandy jane wrote:

Hi steveb mandy here i have done the sums you left me ok?

2 3

2 7

_____

1 5 1

4 6 0

_____

6 1 1

_____That one is wrong, but it is not too far out. You have I think made a minor error with either

the carry of 3 x 7 = 21 and carried a "1" instead of "2". Or maybe you accidentally put in

7 x 2 as 13 rather than 14. The number at the top in the middle bit you have put as " 1 5 1 ".

What did you carry at each stage in this bit ? Do you want to try that bit of it again ?3 6

3 4

______

1 4 4

1 0 8 0

______

1 2 2 4

______Very good. That is correct.

1 6 7

2 5 4

______

6 6 8

8 3 5 0

3 3 4 0 0

_________

4 2 4 1 8

________Very good again, although you have written them a bit out of alignment on the screen you

have got all of the middle bits correct and added them correctly.So you may wish to just look at the first one and see the mistake you made in the first middle number.

Offline

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

2 3

2 7

______

1 6 1

4 6 0

______

6 1 1

______

Am I right now?

Offline

**SteveB****Member**- Registered: 2013-03-07
- Posts: 557

The " 1 6 1 " bit is now correct. Well done.

Now because the answer depends upon this bit being correct you should really redo the addition.

In other words what effect does this have on the final answer ?

Offline

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

The answer is 621 is that right?

Offline

**SteveB****Member**- Registered: 2013-03-07
- Posts: 557

Yes well done. Now what topic do you want to do ?

Multiplication ? Division ? Or the next topic ? (If so which one ?)

Offline

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

Could we do the next topic and then come back to multiplication and division please?

Offline

**SteveB****Member**- Registered: 2013-03-07
- Posts: 557

Right now according to what I have read on something you wrote to me about earlier your next topic

is "Factors and Multiples". Is that the one that you consider to be next. Or is there something else ?

Offline

**mandy jane****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-23
- Posts: 1,003

the next one i would like to do is percentages please if that is ok with you?

Offline