Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#26 2013-02-26 20:11:59

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: The Foundation
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 15,544

Re: no. of divisers

Hi bobbym

I think we should stop chatting because it is abother persons thread, and also, we have already reached that magical point where I have no idea what you are talking about.


“Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

#27 2013-02-27 05:01:20

jacks
Member
Registered: 2012-11-21
Posts: 80

Re: no. of divisers

Yes Bobbym answer Given is

would you like to explain it to me. Thanks

Offline

#28 2013-02-27 05:26:57

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 87,247

Re: no. of divisers

Hi;

I know of nothing better than computing the divisors and then checking mod 4 for each one.

I have been researching the problem for something else but have not found anything.

Just finished reading 8 books on number theory, found 3 new was to compute the Jacobi symbol but did not find a shortcut for yours.

Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-27 12:01:44)


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
Of course that result can be rigorously obtained, but who cares?
Combinatorics is Algebra and Algebra is Combinatorics.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB