Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2013-02-23 03:25:33
Moving CirclesHi! Last edited by SmellyMan (2013-02-23 03:28:56) #2 2013-02-23 03:29:44
Re: Moving CirclesHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #4 2013-02-23 03:50:20
Re: Moving CirclesHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2013-02-23 03:58:06
Re: Moving Circles
This is a friend of him speaking and I'll try make it as clear as possible. Last edited by SmellyMan (2013-02-23 04:00:54) #6 2013-02-23 04:05:58
Re: Moving CirclesThe positions of the tanks are known so they do not need to be calculated. What you require is when the circle overlap contains the center point of the other circle. Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-23 04:06:15) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2013-02-23 04:06:17
Re: Moving Circles
Yes, exactly! Last edited by SmellyMan (2013-02-23 04:06:31) #8 2013-02-23 04:07:00
Re: Moving CirclesHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #10 2013-02-23 04:29:20
Re: Moving CirclesDo you have the equations of the circles that represent where the tank can fire or do you need it? Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-23 04:46:18) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #11 2013-02-23 04:48:53
Re: Moving Circles
No, I do not have any equations of the circles, it is one of our bigger problems in the process. #12 2013-02-23 04:52:07
Re: Moving CirclesYou have the positions of the tanks in (x,y) coordinates, which you will call the centers of the circles? You have the firing radius? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #14 2013-02-23 05:03:29
Re: Moving CirclesThe equation that gives you the circle which represents where a tank can fire is ( x0 , y0 ) is the ordered pair which is the tank position and r is the firing radius. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #15 2013-02-23 05:08:12
Re: Moving Circles
If the x0 and y0 is the current position of the tank in a 2d plane, we basically substract the full length of the axis to get a pythagoras theorem? #16 2013-02-23 05:18:12
Re: Moving CirclesHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #17 2013-02-23 05:18:57
Re: Moving Circles
Yes I've drawn it myself and I've come to understand it, it's not all that complicated. I appreciate the picture! #18 2013-02-23 05:22:02
Re: Moving CirclesThe position of the other tank, the victim, is within range of the first tank when its center is on the circle or inside it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #20 2013-02-23 05:29:03
Re: Moving CirclesOkay, hold on while I try to get the answer. Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-23 05:42:40) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #21 2013-02-23 05:50:35
Re: Moving Circles
This means the formula would look like this: Last edited by SmellyMan (2013-02-23 05:54:44) #22 2013-02-23 05:55:31
Re: Moving CirclesHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #23 2013-02-23 06:05:20
Re: Moving Circles
I'm sorry for any grief I may have caused. I have one more question, but perhaps it'll be resolved when you draw it, so it'll be more clear to me. #24 2013-02-23 06:23:15
Re: Moving CirclesIn the drawing below you are the red tank. You are located at (6,1). You have a firing radius of 5. The equation of the circle for your tank is: There are three enemy tanks they are in blue. Tank1 is at (10,5) to find out if he is in range you just plug into this inequality, 4^2 + 4^2 is not ≤ to 25 so that tank is out of range as the drawing shows. Tank2 is at (6,6), plugging in, 0^2 + 5^2 is ≤ to 25 so that tank is in range. Tank3 is at (9,0), plugging in, 3^3 +(-1)^2 is is ≤ 25 so that tank is in range too as the drawing shows. Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-23 06:27:45) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #25 2013-02-23 06:31:15
Re: Moving CirclesYes, thank you, I figured it'd work like this. Basically you're just comparing the distance between the tanks, and if it's equal or less than the radius, it means that the tank 1 will attack the others. |