Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. Pages: 1 2 #1 20130220 05:37:06
Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceI have a problem I need to solve so I'd need an answer or a way to solve it. #2 20130220 05:40:01
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceI forgot to mention.... without repetitions and order is not important #3 20130220 06:23:14
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceHi; Last edited by bobbym (20130220 13:53:23) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #4 20130220 22:52:04
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceI mean that the sequence of consecutive numbers must not be contained in the result so this result {2,46,31,1,5,3} must also be excluded. #5 20130220 22:56:52
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceHi; Last edited by bobbym (20130222 03:50:49) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6 20130221 05:16:49
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceI think the reccurence is: The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #7 20130221 05:33:50
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceHmmmm? Are you sure? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #8 20130221 05:50:59
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequencePreety much. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #9 20130221 05:52:43
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceWhat are your initial conditions? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10 20130221 06:04:57
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceA(n,k) is 0 for n<=0, except A(0,0)=1. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #11 20130221 06:05:41
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceYou also did not define n or k. What are they? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #12 20130221 06:08:23
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceNumbers, of course. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #13 20130221 06:16:13
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequence
You are saying n=6 and k is the number of consecutives? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #14 20130221 06:21:00
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceNo. n=49 and k=6. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #15 20130221 06:24:59
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceDid you check it by actually running the recurrence? Does it get my answer? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #16 20130221 06:43:20
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceHi bobbym The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #17 20130221 06:47:37
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #18 20130221 06:49:12
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceI'm calculating it. It will take a while. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #19 20130221 06:50:52
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceThat is like music to my ears! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #20 20130221 06:53:52
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceDo you think there is a way to speed it up? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #21 20130221 06:54:57
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceI do not know what you are doing, so how can I say. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #22 20130221 06:56:56
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceI am just running the recurrence. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #23 20130221 06:58:15
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceThat is what I mean. In Maxima? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #24 20130221 06:59:07
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceYes. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #25 20130221 07:00:35
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceWell, when I ask this question the kaboobly doo will hit the fan. Where does it come from? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. Pages: 1 2 