Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#526 2013-02-17 03:56:05

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Then there are some E's in there.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#527 2013-02-17 03:57:24

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

_ _ _ e    _ _ _    _ _ _ _

Hey.

#528 2013-02-17 03:57:49

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

A in there somewhere?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#529 2013-02-17 04:02:19

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

_ a _ e    _ _ _    _ _ _ _

Hey.

#530 2013-02-17 04:04:22

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

An S please.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#531 2013-02-17 04:18:10

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

s a _ e    _ _ _    s _ _ _

Hey.

#532 2013-02-17 04:23:44

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

We need an O!

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#533 2013-02-17 04:34:54

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

s a _ e    o _ _    s _ _ _

Hey.

#534 2013-02-17 04:39:15

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

How about an I?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#535 2013-02-17 06:43:04

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

s a _ e    o _ _    s _ i _

Hey.

#536 2013-02-17 08:44:33

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

How about an L?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

no l

Hey.

#538 2013-02-17 10:09:47

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Give me a N.

Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-17 11:18:24)

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

no n

Hey.

#540 2013-02-18 02:16:24

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Save our ship?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

yes.
_ _ _ _    _ _ _

Hey.

#542 2013-02-18 02:20:32

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

I will guess an E.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

no e

Hey.

#544 2013-02-18 07:35:27

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

How about an A?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

_ _ _ _    _ a_

Hey.

#546 2013-02-18 07:41:05

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Now I will take an I.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

_ i _ _    _ a_

Hey.

#548 2013-02-19 12:32:38

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

How about an S?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

no s

Hey.

#550 2013-02-20 11:11:12

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Maybe an L?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB