Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #2151 20130217 03:18:10
Re: What do you think?What table? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2152 20130217 03:24:59
Re: What do you think?1; The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2153 20130217 03:30:41
Re: What do you think?Hmmm, how do match that up with the pdf? Please demonstrate. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2154 20130217 03:34:38
Re: What do you think?Hi bobbym Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130217 04:10:07) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2155 20130217 03:36:32
Re: What do you think?Then what is i? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2156 20130217 03:38:28
Re: What do you think?Sorry, wrong variable. Check again. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2157 20130217 03:39:56
Re: What do you think?Okay, you were supposed to check that but maybe you are not at your computer. I can check it. Supposing you are right is there an easier way to generate those numbers than he did? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2158 20130217 03:42:02
Re: What do you think?I checked the for values of n from 3 to 9. I did not check the last 4. Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130217 03:43:26) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2159 20130217 03:44:39
Re: What do you think?Okay, I will need to work on it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2160 20130217 03:50:38
Re: What do you think?For this particular problem the formula is T(n) = n![x^n](1+x+x^2/2)^5, which is kinda obvious, considering the fact that it is the number of ways we can put n marbles into 5 jars, with both jars being different and order of putting in mattering. Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130217 03:50:56) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2161 20130217 03:52:28
Re: What do you think?Hold on! You solved it, but so far it is not working. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2162 20130217 03:55:53
Re: What do you think?Why not? Code:sum(i!/(2*6^(i1))*coeff(ratexpand((1+x+x^2/2)^5),x^(i3)),i,3,13),numer; Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130217 04:42:29) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2163 20130217 03:57:25
Re: What do you think?I was talking about the T[n] idea. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2164 20130217 04:02:29
Re: What do you think?It is working for me. What's the problem? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2165 20130217 04:06:41
Re: What do you think?Calm down please. You are getting this to work? Last edited by bobbym (20130217 04:06:58) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2166 20130217 04:09:17
Re: What do you think?I am calm. Sorry if I sounded frustrated. Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130217 04:10:24) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2167 20130217 04:13:59
Re: What do you think?I am kidding you. Just being funny. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2168 20130217 04:34:24
Re: What do you think?I think it is plausible. Give me 5 minutes. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2169 20130217 04:35:08
Re: What do you think?I am working on it also. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2170 20130217 04:37:22
Re: What do you think?Hi bobbym Edit: Here's my code: Code:sum(i*(i4)!/(6^(i1))*binomial(i1,3)*coeff(ratexpand((1+x+x^2/2+x^3/6)^5),x^(i4)),i,4,19); Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130217 04:40:07) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2171 20130217 04:40:12
Re: What do you think?You are jumping ahead, what is that the answer to? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2172 20130217 04:41:32
Re: What do you think?Expected number of throws till we get a number 4 times. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2173 20130217 04:43:38
Re: What do you think?Please hold on with that. We are still working on the 3. I agree that it will be possible to generalize but first I would like to simplify how you are doing the three. If we can do that we can really present it to him as a superior solution. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #2174 20130217 04:45:32
Re: What do you think?Ok. So what do we do now? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #2175 20130217 04:47:26
Re: What do you think?Is there a way to generate the sequence T[5,n] that does not require us to expand a trinomial or a sum with a ceiling function in it? Last edited by bobbym (20130217 04:47:45) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 