Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#501 2013-02-10 08:01:30
#502 2013-02-10 08:08:08
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
E please.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#503 2013-02-10 08:11:33
#504 2013-02-10 08:18:40
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an I?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#505 2013-02-10 08:20:02
#506 2013-02-10 08:23:52
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an A.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#507 2013-02-10 10:05:27
#508 2013-02-10 10:15:42
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an O?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#509 2013-02-10 12:24:39
#510 2013-02-10 12:48:57
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Could be a B in there.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#511 2013-02-10 13:04:28
#512 2013-02-10 13:17:54
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about that W?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#513 2013-02-11 10:00:20
#514 2013-02-11 10:04:33
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Is there a D?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#515 2013-02-11 10:13:56
#516 2013-02-11 22:25:36
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Am narrowing it down nicely, let me have a P please.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#517 2013-02-14 13:48:47
#518 2013-02-14 17:28:24
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Maybe an N is in there?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#519 2013-02-17 03:18:54
#520 2013-02-17 03:21:37
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Y has to be there.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#521 2013-02-17 03:32:29
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
bobbym wrote:
Y has to be there.
.....Correct!!! wit_ yo_
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#522 2013-02-17 03:33:51
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
With you.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#523 2013-02-17 03:48:28
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#524 2013-02-17 03:52:57
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Yikes!
T please.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.