Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#476 2013-02-07 11:39:57
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Is there a D?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#477 2013-02-07 11:43:22
#478 2013-02-07 11:44:58
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Is it got?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#479 2013-02-07 12:11:32
#480 2013-02-07 12:20:08
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Is there an N?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#481 2013-02-08 00:59:32
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
yes. not is the word
_ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#482 2013-02-08 01:21:42
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
T please to start off.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#483 2013-02-08 01:59:48
#484 2013-02-08 02:12:43
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
How about an S?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#485 2013-02-08 03:58:36
#486 2013-02-08 10:58:24
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
I guess there is an E.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#487 2013-02-10 02:16:59
#488 2013-02-10 03:39:42
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Okay, now is there an E.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#489 2013-02-10 03:42:19
#490 2013-02-10 03:43:50
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
An I must be in there.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#491 2013-02-10 03:45:22
#492 2013-02-10 03:47:06
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
How about an O?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#493 2013-02-10 03:49:01
#494 2013-02-10 03:57:16
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Is there a B?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#495 2013-02-10 06:52:36
#496 2013-02-10 06:54:00
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Okay, then there is a T!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#497 2013-02-10 06:59:17
#498 2013-02-10 07:02:21
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Ha ha! There is a good chance there is a W.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#499 2013-02-10 07:05:03
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
yes!
wow
1._ _ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#500 2013-02-10 07:05:42
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
We will start with a T then.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.