Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #451 2013-02-04 02:21:16
Re: Hangman 1No S. woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #452 2013-02-04 02:22:49
Re: Hangman 1Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #453 2013-02-04 02:29:37
Re: Hangman 1oh,it means the avobe letter,W is the first of the word woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #454 2013-02-04 02:33:18
Re: Hangman 1Let me have an E please. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #455 2013-02-04 02:38:44
Re: Hangman 1W _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #456 2013-02-04 02:44:50
Re: Hangman 1Workbench? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #457 2013-02-04 08:06:49#458 2013-02-04 08:19:02
Re: Hangman 1Is there an H? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #459 2013-02-04 09:56:13#460 2013-02-04 10:03:55
Re: Hangman 1Worriedly? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #461 2013-02-05 06:38:12#462 2013-02-05 06:40:26
Re: Hangman 1I do not know what it is... In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #463 2013-02-05 07:54:41#464 2013-02-05 08:11:31
Re: Hangman 1Is there an E? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #465 2013-02-06 09:55:55#466 2013-02-06 10:06:50
Re: Hangman 1There is an A then? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #467 2013-02-06 13:40:46#468 2013-02-06 13:57:37
Re: Hangman 1An I must be in there! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #469 2013-02-07 04:52:04#470 2013-02-07 10:23:31
Re: Hangman 1An O must be in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #471 2013-02-07 10:59:04#472 2013-02-07 11:11:55
Re: Hangman 1And a T? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #473 2013-02-07 11:20:13
Re: Hangman 1_ot woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #474 2013-02-07 11:23:17
Re: Hangman 1Is it hot? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #475 2013-02-07 11:36:37 |