Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

• Index
•  » Help Me !
•  » [PROBABILITY] Conditional Independence does not imply Independence

## #1 2013-02-03 08:35:26

ElGreco
Guest

### [PROBABILITY] Conditional Independence does not imply Independence

Hello everybody, I have a probability question.

Could you please help me prove that "Conditional Independence does not imply Independence", and vice-versa "(Absolute) Independence does not imply Conditional Independence"?

Every book and online resource seems to take it for granted. They only offer simple counter examples, but I haven't found a formal proof, e.g., by contradiction.
If you can reference a book chapter or post the basics of the proof(s) it would help a lot :-)

~ElGreco

## #2 2013-02-03 08:39:44

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: [PROBABILITY] Conditional Independence does not imply Independence

Hi ElGreco

A counter-example is all you need. If it is not true in one case, it is not true.

And, welcome to the forum!

Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-02-03 08:40:08)

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
• Index
•  » Help Me !
•  » [PROBABILITY] Conditional Independence does not imply Independence