Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#426 2013-01-30 10:50:29
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Okay, then there is an L.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#427 2013-01-30 12:39:25
#428 2013-01-30 14:24:01
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Could be an R?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#429 2013-01-31 10:23:31
#430 2013-01-31 19:30:59
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
An N, maybe?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#431 2013-02-01 10:52:17
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
no
hint:they use thid for fishing
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#432 2013-02-01 18:39:03
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Bait?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#433 2013-02-02 12:30:35
#434 2013-02-02 17:38:15
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
T to start us off.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#435 2013-02-03 00:58:09
#436 2013-02-03 01:00:10
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
No E either?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#437 2013-02-03 04:10:20
#438 2013-02-03 05:32:42
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
There is definitely an A.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#439 2013-02-03 07:00:14
#440 2013-02-03 07:11:00
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
How about an I?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#441 2013-02-03 07:19:13
#442 2013-02-03 07:29:48
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Cuba?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#443 2013-02-03 07:32:35
#444 2013-02-03 07:33:43
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Give me a U.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#445 2013-02-03 07:38:12
#446 2013-02-03 07:40:59
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Lyra?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#447 2013-02-03 07:44:04
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
no
hint:look at your avatar
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#448 2013-02-03 07:46:26
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
Yoda?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#449 2013-02-03 07:48:21
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
yes
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#450 2013-02-03 07:53:06
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Hangman 1
There must be hundreds of S's in there so give their position.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.